Rent-based income redistribution in developed market economies

Abstract

Public-sector workers in many countries earn more, on average, than their private-sector peers with similar characteristics. In terms of economic theory, these rewards represent economic rents most of which paid by a nation’s taxpayers. In contrast to economic rents accruing to recipients at the top of income distribution, most of these payments flow from one group of workers to another. For this reason, we call these payments “horizontal” economic rents. The level of horizontal rents is analyzed in this paper for 28 OECD countries, mostly representing Europe, based on public-private sector pay gap data from a number of studies. We found that measured as a ratio of public-sector overpayments to GDP, the highest horizontal rents are paid to government workers in Mediterranean EU countries. These rents are relatively low in larger EU countries, such as Germany and the United Kingdom and negative in Scandinavian countries, possibly reflecting the recognition of the non-monetary benefits of public employment, such as job security. Analyzing the determinants of horizontal rents, we found that their levels are lower in countries with stronger trade unions, as measured by trade-unions density and higher in countries with larger foreign-born populations. Macroeconomic variables, including GDP per capita, trade openness, labor force participation and government indebtedness were found to not measurably influence the level of horizontal rents. Further research is seen to be connected with a wider range of the countries under analysis, including the developing countries, and the other groups of employees with the horizontal economic rent, as well as the possible ways to decrease or to invalidate it as regards the practices analysis of the countries with the negligible or negative rent such as Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Portugal, and Iceland.

Keywords

economic rents, income redistribution, public employment, public-sector wages, private-sectors wages, trade unions

For citation

Izyumov A., Vahaly J. Rent-based income redistribution in developed market economies. Perm University Herald. Economy, 2021, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 39–53. DOI 10.17072/1994-9960-2021-1-39-53

References

1. Palacios M., Lammam C., Ren F., Clemens J. Comparing Government and Private Sector Compensation in Canada. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 2016, vol.4 (1), pp. 95–127.
2. Campos M.M., Depalo D., Papapetrou E., Pérez J.J., Ramos R. Understanding the public-sector pay gap. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 2017, vol. 6 (7), pp. 1–29. doi: 10.1186/s40173-017-0086-0.
3. Izyumov A., Vahaly J. Rent-based exploitation: Top, bottom and horizontal. Kyklos, 2014, vol. 67, iss. 1, pp. 74–81. doi: 10.1111/kykl.12036.
4. Stiglitz J. The price of inequality. New York, W.W. Norton & Company, 2012. 590 p.
5. Piketty T. Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 2014. 640 p. doi: 10.4159/9780674369542.
6. Smith S.P. Pay differentials between Federal Government and private-sector workers. ILR Review, 1976, vol. 29, iss. 2, pp. 179–197. doi: 10.1177/001979397602900201.
7. Smith S.P. Equal pay in the public-sector: Fact or fantasy? Princeton, Princeton University Press, Industrial Relations Section, 1977.
8. Bellante D., Long J. The political economy of the rent-seeking society: The case of public employees and their unions. Journal of Labor Research, 1981, vol. 2 (1), pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1007/BF02685118.
9. Nickell S., Quintini G. The consequences of the decline in public-sector pay in Britain: A little bit of evidence. Economic Journal, 2002, vol. 112, iss. 477, pp. 107–118. doi: 10.1111/1468-0297.00686.
10. Bender K.A. Examining equality between public- and private-sector wage distributions. Economic Inquiry, 2003, vol. 41, iss. 1, pp. 62–79. doi: 10.1093/ei/41.1.62.
11. Mizala A., Romaguera P., Gallegos S. Public-private wage gap in Latin America (1992–2007): A matching approach. Labour Economics, 2011, vol. 18, pp. 115–131. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2011.08.004.
12. Younger S.D., Osei-Assibey E. Are Ghana’s public-sector employees overpaid? Understanding the public/private wage gap and its effect on the government deficit. IFPRI Discussion Paper 1691, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, D.C., 2017. Available at: https://www.ifpri.org/publication/are-ghanas-public-sector-employees-overpaid-understanding-publicprivate-wage-gap-and-its (accessed 10.07.2020).
13. Gittleman M., Pierce B. Compensation for state and local government workers. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2011, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 217–242. doi: 10.1257/jep.26.1.217.
14. Giordano R., et al. The public-sector pay gap in a selection of euro area countries. ECB Working Paper, 2011, no. 1406. Available at: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/153839/1/ecbwp1406.pdf (accessed 10.07.2020).
15. Sławińska K. Public–private sector wage gap in a group of European countries: An empirical perspective. Empirical Economics, 2021, vol. 60 (4), pp. 1747–1775. doi: 10.1007/s00181-020-01841-3.
16. Hospido L., Moral-Benito E. The public-sector wage premium in Spain: Evidence from longitudinal administrative data. Banco de Espana Working Paper, no. 1422, 2014. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2480321 (accessed 10.07.2020).
17. Christopoulou R., Monastiriotis V. Public-private wage duality during the Greek crisis. Oxford Economic Papers, 2016, vol. 68, iss. 1, pp. 174–196. doi: 10.1093/oep/gpv054.
18. Christofides L., Michael M. Exploring the public-private-sector wage gap in European countries. IZA Journal of European Labor Studies, 2013, vol. 2 (15), pp. 1–53. doi: 10.1186/2193-9012-2-15.
19. Nikolic J., Rubil I., Tomic I. Changes in public and private-sector pay structures in two emerging market economies during the crisis. EIZ Working Papers 1403, Zagreb, 2014, pp. 1–43.
20. Lausev J. What has 20 years of public–private pay gap literature told us? Eastern European transitioning vs. developed economies. Journal of Economic Surveys, 2014, vol. 28, iss. 3, pp. 516–550. doi: 10.1111/joes.12039.
21. Brueckner J., Neumark D. Beaches, sunshine, and public-sector pay: Theory and evidence on amenities and rent extraction by government workers. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2014, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 198–230. doi: 10.1257/pol.6.2.198.
22. Diamond R. Housing supply elasticity and rent extraction by state and local governments. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2017, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 74–111. doi: 10.1257/pol.20150320.
23. Ramoni Perazzi J. The compensating differential principle in the public and private-sector: A multivariate statistical analysis approach. Economica, 2007, vol. 32, iss. 24, pp. 95–112.
24. Pfeifer C. Risk aversion and sorting into public-sector employment. German Economic Review, 2011, vol. 12, iss. 1, pp. 85–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0475.2010.00505.x.
25. Prümer S., Schnabel C. Questioning the stereotype of the ‘malingering bureaucrat’: Absence of work in the public and private-sector in Germany. Kyklos, 2019, vol. 72, iss. 4, pp. 570–603. doi: 10.1111/kykl.12212.
26. Tullock G. The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies, and theft. Western Economic Journal, 1967, vol. 5, iss. 3, pp. 224–232. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1967.tb01923.x.
27. Krueger A.O. The political economy of the rent-seeking society. The American Economic Review, 1974, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 291–303.
28. Mohammad S., Whalley J. Rent-seeking in India: Its costs and policy significance. Kyklos, 1984, vol. 37, iss. 3, pp. 387–413. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.1984.tb00708.x.
29. Laband D.N., Sophocleus J.P. The social cost of rent-seeking: First estimates. Public Choice, 1988, vol. 58, pp. 269–276. doi: 10.1007/BF00155672.
30. Dougan W.R. The cost of rent seeking: Is GNP negative? Journal of Political Economy, 1991, vol. 99, iss. 3, pp. 660–664.
31. Congleton R.D. On the emergence of a classic work: A short history of the impact of Gordon Tullock’s welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies, and theft. Public Choice, 2019, vol. 181 (1), pp. 5–12. doi: 10.1007/s11127-018-0542-4.
32. Webb S. The rate of interest and the laws of distribution. The Quarterly Journal of Economic, 1888, vol. 2, iss. 2, pp. 188–208.
33. Shaw B. Fabian essays in socialism. New York, The Humboldt Publishing Co., 1891.
34. Sorensen A.B. On kings, pietism and rent-seeking in Scandinavian welfare states. Acta Sociologoica, 1998, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 363–376.
35. Sorensen A.B. Towards a sounder basis for class analysis. American Journal of Sociology. 2000, vol. 105, no. 6, pp. 1523–1558. doi: 10.1086/210463.
36. Coase R.H. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 1960, vol. 3 (1), pp. 1–44.
37. Mahuteau S., Mavromaras K., Richardson S., Zhu R. Public-private sector wage differentials in Australia. IZA Institute of Labor Economics Publ., Discussion Paper Series, 2017. 21 p.
38. Castro F. de, Salto M., Steiner H. The gap between public and private wages: New evidence for the EU. Economic Papers 508, 2013, pp. 1–38. doi: 10.2765/54811.
39. Law S.H. Trade openness, capital flows and financial development in developing economies. International Economic Journal, 2009, vol. 23, iss. 3, pp. 409–426. doi: 10.1080/10168730903268398.
40. Mooney K. The battle for New Jersey: Chris Christie vs. public employee unions. Labor Watch, Capital Research Center, 2011. Available at: https://capitalresearch.org/article/the-battle-for-new-jersey-chris-christie-vs-public-employee-unions/ (accessed 10.07.2020).
41. Di Mascio F., Natalini A. Fiscal retrenchment in Southern Europe: Changing patterns of public management in Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain. Public Management Review, 2015, vol. 17, iss. 1, pp. 129–148. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.790275.
42. Dawson J. Institutions, investment, and growth: New cross-country and panel data evidence. Economic Inquiry, 1998, vol. 36, iss. 4, pp. 603–619. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1998.tb01739.x.
43. Munger M.C. Tullock and the welfare costs of corruption: There is a “political Coase Theorem”. Public Choice, 2019, vol. 181, pp. 83–100. doi: 10.1007/s11127-018-0610-9.
44. Acemoglu D., Robinson J.A. Rents and economic development: The perspective of why nations fail. Public Choice, 2019, vol. 181, pp. 13–28. doi: 10.1007/s11127-019-00645-z.

Show full text