Theory of institutional and economic disfunctions in the Russian school: Retrospective and prospective views
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/1994-9960-2021-1-19-38Abstract
The article challenges the stereotype which underestimates the accomplishments of the national scientists which generate and develop the current institutional and economic dysfunction theory and provide the pragmatic opportunities for the dysfunction theory. The research aims to consider the contribution of the modern Russian institutional economic school into generating and developing the institutional effects theory with the focus on its tool segment - the theory of economic and institutional dysfunctions. Methodologically, the article is based on the economic theory of institutions, provisions of the modern theory of institutional effects, including the institution dysfunctions, management theories for the economic systems of different complexity levels, as well as the comparative analysis, elements of mathematical modeling, and solutions of the differential equations. Tool capabilities of the dysfunction theory are illustrated for the developing of management recommendations, a measurement device is created to identify a dysfunction and to apply it in order to access the quality of the institutions and economic systems, the possibilities for applying the dysfunctions in the institutional modeling are defined. To do this, a function equation for the financial support of the institution is obtained to examine the connections between the institution monetization, the quality of their functions and their dysfunctions. The differences between the lock-in and dysfunction effects which characterize their connections with the categories, including stability, efficiency/inefficiency, institutions’ quality, are specified, and a dysfunction is defined as a dynamically changing condition, while lock-in can be static. The article points out the key prospective developments of the institutional and economic dysfunction theories: 1) better tools for measuring the dysfunctions; 2) evaluation of the institutional efficiency and functional potential of the institutions, as well as the quality of the institutions and economic systems; 3) dysfunction modeling, including at the level of its connection with the macroeconomic parameters. Further research into the Russian institutional school of the economic science is seen in the development of the dysfunction theory and its methodological tools for its application to analyze different socio-economic phenomena.
Keywordsdysfunction of institutions, dysfunction of economic systems, theoretical provisions of the dysfunction theory, institutional traps, lock-in effect, Russian institutional school, development of the theory of institutional effects
For citationSukharev O.S. Theory of institutional and economic disfunctions in the Russian school: Retrospective and prospective views. Perm University Herald. Economy, 2021, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 19–38. DOI 10.17072/1994-9960-2021-1-19-38
AcknowledgementsThe author would like to thank his students and followers who are developing his theory of institutional and economic dysfunctions in their papers. I would like to extend my gratitude to my students – V.V. Kurmanov, Candidate of Economic Sciences, and K.S. Melkovskaya, Candidate of Economic Sciences, who applied the dysfunction theory to the Internet and functional marketing, as well as to S.V Shmanev, Doctor of Economic Sciences, who exploits the dysfunction in the area of synergetic models. I would like to specifically acknowledge the contribution of the scholars, including the late Yu.K. Persky, Doctor of Economic Sciences, his students T.Yu. Kovaleva, Candidate of Economic Sciences, and E.V. Bazueva, Doctor of Economic Sciences, as well as Z.V. Bragina, Doctor of Economic Sciences, and E.N. Tumanova, Candidate of Economic Sciences, O.I. Vodyanenko, Candidate of Economic Sciences, A.V. Fomin and E.N. Chechetkina, who don’t narrow this area down to the theory of traps, develop it in its own way, and strictly observe the chronology principle in science by identifying the key points and the purpose of the dysfunction theory, by developing and improving the measurement and evaluation tools applied to the managerial, economic, and institutions dysfunctions.
References1. Sukharev O.S. Teoriya ekonomicheskoi disfunktsii [Theory of economic disfynction]. Мoscow, Mashinostroenie-1 Publ., 2001. 212 p. (In Russian).
2. Weber M. Khozyaistvo i obshchestvo: ocherki ponimayushchei sotsiologii. Obshchnosti / per. s nem.; pod red. L.G. Ionina [Economy and society: Essays of understanding sociology. Communities. Transl. from German; ed. by L.G. Ionin]. Moscow, Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki Publ., 2017. 432 p. (In Russian).
3. Merton R.K. Sotsial'naya teoriya i sotsial'naya struktura [Social theory and social structure]. Moscow, AST, Khranitel' Publ., 2006. 880 p. (In Russian).
4. Parsons T. Sistema sovremennykh obshchestv [System of modern societies]. Moscow, Aspekt-Press Publ., 1998. 270 p. (In Russian).
5. Eggertsson T. Quick guide to new institutional economics. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2013, vol. 41 (1), pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jce.2013.01.002.
6. Hodgson G. A Modern reader in evolutionary and institutional economics. Cheltenham and Northampton, Edward Elgar Publ., 2002. 256 p.
7. Myrdal G. The political element in the development of economic theory. Transaction Publ., 1990. 298 p.
8. North D.C. Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1991, vol. 5 (1), pp. 97–112.
9. North D.C. Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton University Press, 2005. 187 p.
10. Ostrom E. Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 2010, vol. 100 (3), pp. 641–672.
11. Stiglitz J. The Stiglitz report: Reforming the international monetary and financial systems in the wake of the global crisis. The New Press, 2010. 240 p.
12. Williamson O.E. The theory of the firm as governance structure: From choice to contract. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2002, vol. 16 (3), pp. 171–195.
13. Williamson O.E. The economics of governance. American Economic Review, 2005, no. 95, pp. 1–18. doi: 10.1257/000282805774669880.
14. Sukharev O.S. Rossiiskaya ekonomika: opyt sistemnoi diagnostiki i lecheniya [Russian economy: Experience of constitutional diagnosis and treatment]. Investitsii v Rossii [Investments in Russia], 1999, no. 9, pp. 28–37. (In Russian).
15. Sukharev O.S. Teoriya disfunktsii institutov i ekonomicheskikh sistem (k 15-letiyu razrabotki dannoi teorii v Rossii) [Theory of dysfunction of institutions and economic systems (For the 15th anniversary of the development of this theory in Russia)]. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoi teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 2014, no. 1, pp. 27–40. (In Russian).
16. Polterovich V.M. Transplantatsiya ekonomicheskikh institutov [Transplantation of economic institutions]. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii [Economics of Contemporary Russia], 2001, no. 3, pp. 24–50. (In Russian).
17. Shershneva O.I., Kraeva M.A. Institutsional'nye lovushki i disfunktsii ekonomicheskikh institutov [Institutional traps and dysfunctions of economic institutions]. Forum molodykh uchenykh [Forum of Young Scientists], 2018, no. 6-3 (22), pp. 742–746. (In Russian).
18. Khussein I.Ya. Prichiny disfunktsii rynka kapitala v kontekste institutsional'noi teorii [Reasons for capital market dysfunctions in an institutional theory]. Ekonomicheskaya nauka v Saratovskom universitete: proshloe i sovremennost': materialy Mezhdunar. konf. v ramkakh Mezhdunar. nauch. simpoziuma, posvyashch. 100-letiyu gumanitarnogo obrazovaniya v SGU “Stoletie gumanitarnogo obrazovaniya v Saratovskom gosudarstvennom universitete: dialog vremen – proshedshego, nastoyashchego i budushchego” / pod red. O.Yu. Chelnokovoi [Economic science in Saratov University: Past and modern times. Proceedings of the International Conference within International Scientific Symposium dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the humanitarian education in Saratov State University “100th Anniversary of Humanitarian Education in Saratov State University: Dialogues of the times – Past, Present and Future”. Ed. by O.Yu. Chelnokova], Saratov, Izdatel'stvo «Saratovskii istochnik» Publ., 2017, pp. 74–79. (In Russian).
19. Fomin R.V. Institutsional'naya lovushka modernizatsii regional'noi sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoi politiki Yuzhnogo federal'nogo okruga v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii ekonomiki [Institutional trap of modernization of the regional socio-economic policy of the Southern Federal District in the conditions of digitalization of the economy]. Sovremennaya ekonomika: problemy i resheniya [Modern Economics: Problems and Solutions], 2020, no. 3 (123), pp. 186–196. (In Russian). doi: 10.17308/meps.2020.3/2336.
20. Sukharev O.S. Ob ekonomicheskikh teoriyakh i glavnoi metodologicheskoi probleme institutsional'noi ekonomiki [About the economic theories and main methodological problem in an institutional economy]. Teoriya i praktika institutsional'nykh preobrazovanii v Rossii [Theory and Practice of Institutional Transformations in Russia], 2004, iss. 3, pp. 97–110. (In Russian).
21. Sukharev O.S. The Neoinstitutional contracts theory: New perspectives. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 2012, vol. 8 (1), pp. 85–111.
22. Fomin A.V. Formirovanie mekhanizmov regulirovaniya sotsial'no-ekonomicheskikh disfunktsii gosudarstva. Avtoref. diss. cand. ekon. nauk [Development of regulation mechanisms for the social-economic dysfunctions of the state. Cand. econ. sci. author. diss.]. Saratov, 2012. 22 p. (In Russian).
23. Chechetkina E.N. Sistema institutov ekonomicheskoi politiki gosudarstva i osobennosti ikh realizatsii v Rossii. Avtoref. diss. cand. ekon. nauk [Institution systems of the public economic policy and their implementation features in Russia. Cand. econ. sci. author. diss.]. Saratov, 2013. 21 p. (In Russian).
24. Sukharev O.S. Teoriya effektivnosti ekonomiki [Theory of economy efficiency], Moscow, Kurs Publ., 2020. 256 p. (In Russian).
25. Vodyanenko O.I. Institutsional'nye disfunktsii sotsial'noi ekonomiki i puti ikh preodoleniya [Institutional dysfunctions of social economy and ways of their overcoming]. Vestnik VGUIT [Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies], 2018, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 489–493. (In Russian). doi: 10.20914/2310-1202-2018-3-489-493.
26. Persky Yu.K., Kovaleva T.Yu. Strategicheskie imperativy preodoleniya institutsional'noi neeffektivnosti intellektual'nogo predprinimatel'stva v ekonomike Rossii [Strategy imperatives of institutional inefficiency overcoming of intellectual entrepreneurship in Russia]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika [Perm University Herald. Economy], 2009, no. 3 (3), pp. 6–15. (In Russian).
27. Kovaleva T.Yu. Problema institutsional'noi neeffektivnosti v razvitii intellektual'nogo predprinimatel'stva [Problem of institutional inefficiency in the development of intellectual entrepreneurship]. Vestnik UGTU-UPI [UGTU-UPI Bulletin], 2009, no. 4, pp. 26–36.
28. Sukharev O.S. Metodologiya i vozmozhnosti ekonomicheskoi nauki [Methodology and possibilities of economic science]. Moscow, Kurs, INFRA-M Publ., 2013. 368 p. (In Russian).
29. Kovaleva T.Yu., Bazueva E.V. Determinanty kachestva sistemy institutov klasternogo razvitiya regional'noi ekonomiki [Determinants of the quality of system of institutions of the regional economy cluster development]. Vestnik AGTU. Seriya: Ekonomika [Vestnik of Astrakhan State Technical University. Series: Economics], 2016, no. 1, pp. 21–30. (In Russian).
30. Sukharev O.S. Instituty i ekonomicheskoe razvitie [Institutions and economic development]. Мoscow, DeКА Publ., 2005. 384 p. (In Russian).
31. Kapoguzov E.A., Chupin R.I. Padenie transaktsionnogo sektora: aprel'skie trendy i posledstviya al'ternativ ekonomicheskoi politiki [Fall of transactional sector: April trends and consequences of economic policy alternatives]. Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i prava [Actual Problems of Economics and Law], 2020, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 381–391. (In Russian). doi: 10.21202/1993-047X.14.2020.2.381-391.
32. Shmanev S.V. Innovatsionnaya rol' institutov v transformatsii real'nogo sektora ekonomiki pri formirovanii sistemy upravleniya sotsial'no-ekonomicheskim razvitiem Rossii [Innovative role of institutions in the transformation of the real sector of the economics in the formation of the management system of social and economic development in Russia]. Vestnik ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti [Vestnik of Economic Security], 2020, no. 2, pp. 303–308. (In Russian). doi: 10.24411/2414-3995-2020-10133.
33. Alekseenko A.G. Disfunktsii rossiiskogo rynka sliyanii i pogloshchenii: prichiny, posledstviya, sposoby preodoleniya [Dysfunction of Russian market of mergers and acquisitions: Causes, consequences, methods of overcoming]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika [Journal of Volgograd State University. Economics], 2019, no. 21 (3), pp. 29–35. (In Russian). doi: 10.15688/ek.jvolsu.2019.3.3.
34. Palash S.V. Gosudarstvennye programmy razvitiya APK Kostromskoi oblasti: disfunktsii strategicheskogo planirovaniya [The state program of development of agriculture of the Kostroma region: Dysfunction of strategic planning]. Mezhdunarodnye nauchnye issledovaniya [International Scientific Researches], 2016, no. 3 (28), pp. 93–101. (In Russian).
35. Selitskii V.S. Disfunktsii upravleniya [Dysfunctions of management]. Izvestiya Gomel'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. F. Skoriny [Journal of F. Skorina Gomel State University], 2019, no. 2 (113), pp. 144–148. (In Russian).
36. Bragina Z.V., Tumanova E.N. Upravlencheskie disfunktsii i terminal'noe upravlenie [Administrative dysfunctions and terminal management]. Upravlenie ekonomicheskimi sistemami: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal [Management of Economic Systems. Scientific Electronic Journal], 2014, no. 9 (69). (In Russian) Available at: http://uecs.ru/regionalnaya-ekonomika/item/3035-2014-09-10-06-02-48 (accessed 01.07.2019).
37. Sukharev O.S. Institutsional'noe modelirovanie v upravlenii ekonomicheskimi sistemami [Institutional modeling in management economic systems]. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya [Management Theory and Practice], 2017, no. 10, pp. 38–54. (In Russian).
38. Sukharev O.S. Disfunktsiya upravleniya: kak formirovat' ekonomicheskuyu politiku [Dysfunction of management: How to develop economic policy]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo [Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship], 2016, no. 3 (part 1), pp. 26–40. (In Russian).
39. Sukharev O.S. Disfunktsiya na urovne makro- i mikroupravleniya sotsial'no-ekonomicheskimi sistemami [Dysfunction at the level of macro and micro management of socio-economic systems]. Ergodizain [Ergodesign], 2019, no. 4, pp. 173–178. (In Russian). doi: 10.30987/2619-1512-2019-2019-4-173-178.
40. Sukharev O.S. Disfunktsiya pravil i institutsional'naya effektivnost' [Dysfunctions of the rules and institutional effectiveness], Zhurnal ekonomicheskoi teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 2020, no. 2, pp. 433–450. (In Russian). doi: 10.31063/2073-6517/2020.17-2.16.
41. Popov E.V. Instituty [Institutions]. Yekaterinburg, IE UrO RAN Publ., 2015. 712 p. (In Russian).
42. Orekhova S.V. Formirovanie metodologii ustoichivogo razvitiya metallurgicheskogo predpriyatiya na osnove resursno-institutsional'nogo podkhoda. Avtoref. diss. dokt. ekon. nauk [Resource-institutional approach based sustainable development methodology design for a metallurgic factory. Dr. econ. sci. author. diss.]. Yekaterinburg, 2018. 53 p. (In Russian).