Theory of industrial organization: The problem of defining the subject

Abstract

The object of analysis in the industrial organization theory remains debatable. A comparative approach applied to solve the problem in the study shows that the object in the industrial organization theory is conventionally interpreted as different forms of applied, i. e. industrial, microeconomics. The author views industrial market as a structural component of economy with its own laws of development. If the object of analysis in the industrial organization theory is the industry itself, then the subject should be focused on studying the driving forces which determine the direction of its development. The objects of analysis in the current industrial markets theory and in microeconomic analysis match due to their common methodology – the statistical analysis. Given the industry’s dynamic nature, it would be the most appropriate to reproduce the approach which combines systematic and dynamic methods. This approach demonstrates that industry’s evolution is driven by the resolution of contradictions between the firm and market conditions. The direct cause of market changes are shown to be the changes in the productive forces, and the direct driving force is the firm. While changing, the firm creates new market conditions which accumulate and trigger qualitative transformations of the market, forcing it to adapt to the changes in a new way. An on-going contradiction between them becomes the engine of development for both the industry and the firm. This interpretation of the object in the industrial organization theory and the reproduced methodology used provide ample opportunities for solving two theoretically and pragmatically crucial problems – defining the causes and factors of the industrial markets development, and defining the patterns in product markets development, which allows us to predict the process of market evolution. Further analysis of the internal development will reveal the evolutionary nature of the industries and markets and give some insights into the nature of their interaction with the society’s productive forces and public institutes being the reflections of the production relationships.

Keywords

industrial organization, industrial organization theory, microeconomics, methodology, subject of industrial organization theory, static analyses, dynamic analyses, reproduction approach

For citation

Taranukha Yu.V. Theory of industrial organization: The problem of defining the subject. Perm University Herald. Economy, 2021, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 5–18. DOI 10.17072/1994-9960-2021-1-5-18

References

1. Einav L., Levin J. Empirical industrial organization: A progress report. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2010, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 145–162. doi: 10.1257/jep.24.2.145.
2. Levin J., Einav L. Empiricheskie issledovaniya otraslevykh rynkov: osnovnye dostizheniya [Empirical industrial organization: A progress report]. Voprosy Ekonomiki [Voprosy Ekonomiki], 2012, no. 1, pp. 21–41. (In Russian). doi: 10.32609/0042-8736-2012-1-21-41.
3. Baumol W. J. Determinanty otraslevoi struktury i teoriya sostyazatel'nykh rynkov // Panorama ekonomicheskoi mysli kontsa KhKh stoletiya: v 2 t. Pod red. D. Grineuei, M. Blini, I. Styuart [Determinants of industry structure and contestable market theory. Companion to contemporary economic thought: 2 vol. Ed. by D. Greenaway, M. Bleaney, I. Stewart]. Saint Petersburg, Ekonomicheskaya shkola Publ., 2002, vol. 1, pp. 618–637. (In Russian).
4. Schmalensee R. Industrial economics: An overview. Economic Journal, 1988, vol. 98, pp. 643–681. doi: 10.2307/2233907.
5. Coase R. Firma, rynok, pravo: sb. st. [The Firm, the Market and the Law]. Мoscow, Novoe izdatel'stvo Publ., 2007. 224 p. (In Russian).
6. Stigler G.J. The organization of industry. Homewood, Irvin, 1988. 328 p.
7. Church J., Ware R. Industrial organization: A strategic approach. Boston, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000. 1024 р.
8. Shepherd W.G, Shepherd J.M. The economics of industrial organization. 5-th ed. Illinois, Waveland Press Inc., 2004. 426 p.
9. Taranukha Yu.V. O prirode regulirovaniya konkurentsii [Toward a nature of competition regulation]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ekonomika [St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies], 2019, vol. 35, iss. 3, pp. 330–359. (In Russian). doi: 10.21638/spbu05.2019.302.
10. Robertson T.S., Gatinion G. Rasprostranenie tekhnologicheskikh novovvedenii. Rynochnyi aspekt. Novaya tekhnologiya i organizatsionnye struktury [Spread of technological innovations. Market Area. New technology and organizational structures]. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 1990. 270 p. (In Russian).
11. Marx K. Kapital. Т. I [Capital. Vol. 1]. In book: Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya. 2-e izd. [Selected works. 2-nd edition]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1960, vol. 23. 907 p. (In Russian).
12. Jacquemin A.P., Jong H.W.de European industrial organization. London, Macmillan Co, 1977. 269 р.
13. Jacquemin A. The new industrial organization. Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press, 1987. 230 р.
14. Jong H.W.de European industrial organization: Entrepreneurial economics in organization setting. In book: Mainstream in industrial organization. Ed. by H.W. de Jong, W.G. Shepherd. Вook I. Theory and International Aspects. Vol. 6, Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff Publ., 1986. P. 69–112.
15. Shepherd W.C. The economics of industrial organization: Analysis, Markets, Policies. New Jersey, Prentice-Hall International, Inc., 1997. 447 p.
16. Carlsson B. Industrial dynamics: An overview. In book: Industrial Dynamics. Technological, Organizational, and Structural Changes in Industries and Firms. Ed. by B. Carlsson. Dordrecht, Cluver, 1989. Р. 1–19. doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-1075-1.
17. Carlsson B. Industrial dynamics: A review of the literature 1990–2009. Industry and Innovation, 2016, vol. 23, iss. 1, pp. 1–61. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2015.1120658.
18. Baumol W. Sostyazatel'nye rynki: myatezh v teorii struktury otrasli [Contestable markets: An uprising in the theory of industry structure]. In book: Vekhi ekonomicheskoi mysli. T. 5. Teoriya otraslevykh rynkov [Key Concepts of Economic Thought. Vol. 5. Theory of industrial organization]. Saint Petersburg, Ekonomicheskaya shkola Publ., 2005, pp. 110–140. (In Russian).
19. Dubyanskii A.N. Teoriya deneg Marksa: istoricheskii analiz [Karl Marx’s theory of money: Historical analysis]. Vestnik SPbGU. Ekonomika [St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies], 2019, vol. 35, iss. 1, pp. 153–169. (In Russian). doi: 10.21638/spbu05.2019.106.
20. Mill J.S. Osnovy politicheskoi ekonomii [Basis of political economy]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1981, vol. 3. 450 p. (In Russian).
21. Clark J.B. Raspredelenie bogatstva [Distribution of wealth]. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 1992. 447 p. (In Russian).
22. Schumpeter J.A. Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [Theory of economic development]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1982. 401 p. (In Russian).
23. Kondrat'ev N.D. K voprosu o ponyatiyakh ekonomicheskoi statiki, dinamiki i kon"yunktury // Izbrannye proizvedeniya [About the concepts of economic statistics, dynamics, and activities. In book: Selected Works]. Мoscow, Ekonomika Publ., 1993. (In Russian).
24. Nelson R.R., Winter S.G. Evolyutsionnaya teoriya ekonomicheskikh izmenenii [Evolutionary theory of economic changes]. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2002. 536 p. (In Russian).
25. Lenin V.I. Imperializm kak vysshaya stadiya kapitalizma // Polnoe sobranie sochinenii [Imperialism as the highest stage of capitalism. In book: Full collection of works]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1969, vol. 27. (In Russian).

Show full text