Human centered development of Russian megacities: Opportunities and limitations

Abstract

Currently, the role of the big cities in the development of economy and society, the organization of high-quality urban space for people are widely discussed. However, there are still many unresolved urban issues with the crucial one being the need for the city-person interaction. Better interaction, diversity in satisfying the population’s needs, feedback from an active citizen who influences the development of the city are the attributes of modern metropolis that competes for any person. City’s advantages result in a greater population size and better quality of their life. Otherwise, the city shows the degradation signs and population decline. The purpose of the study is to justify the need for a multi-criteria assessment of living conditions in the Russian megalopolises under the citizens’ needs and the improvement of modern urban space. This assessment could guide the managerial decisions in defining the strategic priorities in city development. The following methodological tools were used: experts’ assessments of urban environment quality, demographic analysis of urban population movement; positioning of Russian megacities by criteria ‘urban environment quality’ and ‘population’s cost of living’, their grouping by the qualitative characteristics of urban environment; content analysis of the strategic documents for the development of the largest megacities. The novelty of the study is a new interpretation of the concept of ‘place’ in terms of the urban area. It is defined in a broader sense rather than a particular localization with the borders. It is an urban environment with a set of different opportunities to meet citizens’ growing needs. The study arrives at the approaches to a multi-criteria assessment of the living conditions in million cities under the citizens’ needs. To do this, the authors applied the methods of the Ministry of Construction, Housing and Utilities in the Russian Federation and analyzed the conditions and dynamics of the urban environment, studied the demographic processes, and evaluated the megalopolis attractiveness under the income and cost of living ratio. This revealed the challenges of the cities which could be theoretically solved in the strategic documents of megalopolis development, while the development of efficient mechanisms could help in the practical implementation of the solutions (municipal programs and projects). The article offers to analyze and constantly update the strategic documents of the million cities with regard to the public opinion and the needs of city dwellers in high-quality urban space. The authors worded the need to re-define the urban space which used to be interpreted as a place for living and the human role in its development. The results of the study could be of interest to public authorities and local governments that strategically manage the million cities. Further research is seen to be connected with the development of a comprehensive integral multi-criteria assessment for the current condition and dynamics in the urban space quality to define the megalopolis competitiveness in terms of their interest for the citizens.

Keywords

megalopolis, urbanization, urban population, urban environment quality, cost of living, quality of life, territorial development, public spaces, urban positioning, urban development strategy

For citation

Artemova O.V., Logacheva N.M. Human centered development of Russian megacities: Opportunities and limitations. Perm University Herald. Economy, 2021, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 183–201. DOI 10.17072/1994-9960-2021-2-183-201

Acknowledgements

The article was prepared under the 2021 Research Schedule of the Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

References

1. Ignat'ev Yu.V., Kostin A.M., Belov S.A. Territorial'nye resursy goroda: gradostroitel'stvo i upravlenie gorodskimi territoriyami: monografiya [Territorial city’s resources: Urban planning and management of city territories: Monograph]. Chelyabinsk, YuUrGU Publ., 2013. 146 p. (In Russian).
2. Patsiorkovskii V.V. Sotsiologiya rasseleniya kak spetsial'naya sotsiologicheskaya teoriya [Resettlement sociology as a special sociological science]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Social Studies], 2012, no.4 (336), pp. 25–34. (In Russian).
3. Delitts Kh. Arkhitektura v sotsial'nom izmerenii [Architecture in social dimension]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Social Studies], 2008, no. 10, pp. 113–121. (In Russian).
4. Maergoiz I.M. Geograficheskoe uchenie o gorodakh [Geographic theory about cities]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1987. 120 p. (In Russian).
5. Animitsa E.G., Vlasova N.Yu. Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya gorodskikh aglomeratsii [Problems and prospects of urban agglomerations development]. Regionalistika [Regionalistics], 2020, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 60–66. (In Russian). doi: 10.14530/reg.2020.3.60.
6. Zhikharevich B.S., Pribyshin T.K. Strategiya razvitiya gorodov: rossiiskaya praktika 2014–2019 gg. [Urban development strategies: Russian practice 2014–2019]. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika [Spatial Economics], 2019, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 184–204. (In Russian). doi: 10.14530/se.2019.4.184-204.
7. Sapena M., Wurm M., Taubenbock H., Tuia D., Ruiz LA. Estimating quality of life dimensions from urban spatial pattern metrics. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2021, vol. 85, no. 101549. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101549.
8. Wirth L. Urbanism as way of life. The American Journal of Sociology, 1938, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1–24. doi: 10.1086/217913.
9. Alekseevskii M.D. Gorodskaya antropologiya. Ot lokal'nykh «plemen» do global'nykh «potokov» [Urban anthropology. From local tribes to global flows]. Gorozhanin. Chto my znaem o zhitele bol'shogo goroda? [Urban Dweller. What do we know about an inhabitant of a big city?]. Moscow, Strelka Press Publ., 2017. 216 p. (In Russian).
10. Baldwin R. Velikaya konvergentsiya. Informatsionnye tekhnologii i novaya globalizatsiya [The great convergence. Information technology and the new globalization]. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2018. 416 p. (In Russian).
11. Babaeva A.V., Krasheninnikov A.A. Antropologicheskoe izmerenie prostranstva sovremennogo goroda [Anthropological measurement of modern city space]. Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta [Vestnik of Minin University], 2019, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 14. (In Russian). doi: 10.26795/2307-1281-2019-7-2-14.
12. Naumov S.V., Ermolenko A.A. Kategoriya mesta v sovremennoi teorii ekonomicheskogo prostranstva [Category of place in modern theory of economic space]. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika [Spatial Economics], 2020, issue 16, no. 2, pp. 101–123. (In Russian). doi: 10.14530/se.2020.2.101-123.
13. Chichkanov V.P., Kuklin A.A., Okhotnikov S.A., Korobkov I.V. Blagosostoyanie lichnosti v usloviyakh krizisa sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoi sistemy regiona [Welfare of the individual in the crisis of the regional socioeconomic system]. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia], 2020, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 49–58. (In Russian). doi: 10.19181/lsprr.2020.16.3.4.
14. Antonyuk V.S., Kremer D.V. Ekonomicheskii potentsial krupnykh munitsipal'nykh obrazovanii: teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie podkhody k analizu [The economic potential of large municipal entities: theoretical and methodological approaches to analysis]. Sotsium i vlast' [Society and Power], 2020, no. 3 (83), pp. 40–55. (In Russian). doi: 10.22394/1996-0522-2020-3-40-55.
15. Jacobs J. Smert' i zhizn' bol'shikh amerikanskikh gorodov: perevod s angl. [The death and life of great American cities. Translated from English]. Moscow, Novoe izdatel'stvo Publ., 2011. 460 p. (In Russian).
16. Xing C.B., Zhang J.F. The preference for larger cities in China: Evidence from rural-urban migrants. China Economic Review, 2017, vol. 43, pp. 72–90. doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2017.01.005.
17. Chiesura A. The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2004, vol. 68, iss. 1, pp. 129–138. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.003.
18. Kaklauskas A., Zavadskas E.K, Radzeviciene A., Ubarte I., Podviezko A., Podvezko V., Kuzminske A., Banaitis A., Binkyte A., Bucinskas V. Quality of city life multiple criteria analysis. Cities, 2018, vol. 72, pp. 82–93. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.002.
19. Volkova E.M. Razvitie transportnoi sistemy megapolisa na baze vysokoproizvoditel'nykh vidov transporta [The development of megalopolis transport system based on high-performance modes of transport]. Saint Petersburg, Izdatel'stvo OOO "Institut nezavisimykh sotsial'no-ekonomicheskikh issledovanii – otsenka" Publ., 2019. 148 p. (In Russian).
20. Sharov M.I., Mikhailov A.Yu. Otsenka nadezhnosti funktsionirovaniya gorodskogo obshchestvennogo transporta v gorodakh Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Assessment of reliability of the city public transport functioning in the Russian Federation cities]. Vestnik Sibirskogo gosudarstvennogo avtomobil'no-dorozhnogo universiteta [The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal], 2019, vol. 16, no. 3 (67), pp. 302–311. (In Russian). doi: 10.26518/2071-7296-2019-3-302-311.
21. Gehl J. Goroda dlya lyudei [Cities for People]. Moscow. Al'pina Pablisher Publ., 2012. 276 p. (In Russian).
22. Glaeser E.L., Gottlieb J.D. The wealth of cities: Agglomeration economies and spatial equilibrium in the United States. Journal of Economic Literature, 2009, no. 47 (4), pp. 983–1028. doi: 10.1257/jel.47.4.983.
23. Kuznetsova O.V. Strategiya prostranstvennogo razvitiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii: illyuziya reshenii i real'nost' problem [Problems of elaboration of spatial development strategy of the Russian Federation]. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika [Spatial Economics], 2019, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 107–125. (In Russian). doi: 10.14530/se.2019.4.107-125.
24. Nowak P. Regional variety in quality of life in Poland. Oeconomia Copernicana, 2018, vol. 9, iss. 3, pp. 381–401. doi: 10.24136/oc.2018.019.
25. Helliwell J.F., Huang H.F., Grover S., Wang S. Empirical linkages between good governance and national well-being. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2018, vol. 46, iss. 4, pp. 1332–1346. doi: 10.1016/j.jce.2018.01.004.

Show full text