A model for evaluating and eliminating the problems of “shoсk” transition to distance learning in a modern university

Abstract

The current epidemic situation in Russia and the world caused by coronavirus infection requires prompt solutions to eliminate the consequences of the pandemic in almost all sectors of economic activity. The isolation of the population from mutual contacts was one of the effective solutions to the problem. This arose the need for the educational institutions to promptly switch to a remote mode of education. Those involved in the distance learning process faced a wide range of different problems, which defines the topicality of developing the efficient measures aimed to overcome the challenges of the distance learning process. The subject of the work is the analysis of the processes arising from the sudden transition of the educational environment of the university to the distance learning format, the development of a rating model designed to grade the problems which are important for the students and which are determined by the transition to the distance learning format, and the development of directions for solving the established problems. The aim of the study is to identify the problems that have arisen from the transition to a distance learning format among the students and to develop an organizational and managerial tool to fix these problems. The study relies on the information taken from a secondary data analysis performed by the Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM) and the results of their own research by the students specializing in Economics at the Institute of Economics and Management in Penza State University. The research methods included SPSS based comparative and frequency analysis. The scientific novelty of the work is as follows: 1) a rating evaluation of the problems arising from the transfer of the educational process of the university to a distance learning format in the context of a "shock" transition associated with force majeure caused by coronavirus infection has been developed; 2) University students’ satisfaction with distance learning and students’ readiness to apply the technological distance learning tools and possibilities of Moodle based electronic educational resources in the distance learning format have been identified. Statistical processing of the research results with nonparametric criteria contributes into the reliability of the findings and the recommendation. The practical significance of the research lies in the developed concept of the organizational and managerial mechanism for overcoming the problems arising from the transition to the university’s distance learning environment. This mechanism refers to the social and informational areas, reduces the time of transition to the distance learning format, and accounts for the interests and readiness of the teaching staff and students. Further research is seen to be connected with monitoring the validity of the revealed problems in their dynamics with a one semester lag.

Keywords

social environment of the university, informational environment of the university, contact learning, distance learning, information technologies in education, factor analysis, organizational and managerial mechanism

For citation

Koshevoy O.S., Khokhlova I.G., Dudkina S.V. A model for evaluating and eliminating the problems of “shoсk” transition to distance learning in a modern university. Perm University Herald. Economy, 2021, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 303–321. DOI 10.17072/1994-9960-2021-3-303-321

References

1. Goncalves S.P., Sousa M.J., Pereira F.S. Distance learning perceptions from higher education students – The case of Portugal. Education Sciences, 2020, no. 10 (12), pp. 1–15. doi: 10.3390/educsci10120374.
2. Zaccoletti S., Camacho A., Correia N., Aguiar C., Mason L., Alves R.A., Daniel J.R. Parents’ perceptions of student academic motivation during the COVID-19 lockdown: A cross-country comparison. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, no. 11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.592670.
3. Ferraro F.V., Ambra F.I., Aruta L., Iavarone M.L. Distance learning in the COVID-19 era: Perceptions in Southern Italy. Education Sciences, 2020, no. 10 (12), pp. 1–10. doi: 10.3390/educsci10120355.
4. Izagirre-Olaizola J., Morandeira-Arca J. Business management teaching–learning processes in times of pandemic: Flipped classroom at a distance. Sustainability, 2020, no. 12 (23), pp. 1–18. doi: 10.3390/su122310137.
5. de Jonge E., Kloppenburg R., Hendriks P. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on social work education and practice in the Netherlands. Social Work Education, 2020, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 1027–1036. doi: 10.1080/02615479.2020.1823363.
6. Bao W. COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2020, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 113–115. doi: 10.1002/hbe2.191.
7. Cameron-Standerford A., Menard K., Edge C., Bergh B., Shayter A., Smith K., VandenAvond L. The phenomenon of moving to Online/Distance delivery as a result of COVID-19: Exploring initial perceptions of higher education faculty at a rural midwestern university. Frontiers in Education, 2020, no. 5. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2020.583881.
8. Smirnova A.S. Organizatsiya distantsionnogo obucheniya studentov v usloviyakh pandemii [Organization of distance learning of students in the conditions of the pandemic]. Vestnik PGU im. Sholom-Aleikhema [Bulletin of Sholom Aleichem Priamursky State University], 2020, no. 4 (41), pp. 93–100. (In Russian). doi: 10.24412/2227-1384-2020-4-93-100.
9. Kumokhin A.G., Kachaev R.I. Aktual'nye problemy distantsionnogo obucheniya [Current problems of distance learning]. Obrazovanie. Nauka. Nauchnye kadry [Education. Science. Scholars], 2020, no. 4, pp. 304–307. (In Russian). doi: 10.24411/2073-3305-2020-10264.
10. Sadykova R.Kh. Distantsionnoe obuchenie studentov: realii i opyt [Distance learning of students: Realities and experience]. Kontsept [Koncept], 2020, no. 9, pp. 41–56. (In Russian). doi: 10.24411/2304-120X-2020-11063.
11. Puchkova E.B., Temnova L.V., Sorokoumova E.A., Cherdymova E.I. Gotovnost' prepodavatelei vuzov k distantsionnoi rabote v period pandemii COVID-19 [University professors ready to work remotely implement distance learning during the COVID 19 pandemic]. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya [Perspectives of Science and Education], 2020, no. 48, pp. 89–102. (In Russian). doi: 10.32744/pse.2020.6.8.
12. Crawford J., Butler-Henderson K., Rudolph J., Malkawi B., Glowatz M., Burton R., Magni P., Lam S. COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 2020, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–20. doi: 10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7.
13. Rahmah A., Sukmasetya P., Romadhon M.S., Adriansyah A.R. Developing distance learning monitoring dashboard with Google sheet: An approach for flexible and low-price solution in pandemic era. 2020 International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS), 19–20 Nov., 2020. doi: 10.1109/ICISS50791.2020.9307558.
14. Gardanova Z., Ponkratov V., Kuznetsov N., Nikitina N., Dudnik O., Latypova E., Shcherbatykh S. A model for optimizing the structure of teaching techniques for distance learning in the Russian higher education system. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2020, no. 6 (4), pp. 1–21. doi: 10.3390/joitmc6040147.
15. Okada A., Sheehy K. Factors and recommendations to support students’ enjoyment of online learning with fun: A mixed method study during COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 2020, no. 5. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2020.584351.
16. Mathew V.N., Chung E. University students’ perspectives on open and distance learning (ODL) implementation amidst COVID-19. Asian Journal of University Education, 2020, no. 16 (4), pp. 152–160. doi: 10.24191/ajue.v16i4.11964.
17. Lee K., Fanguy M., Lu X.S., Bligh B. Student learning during COVID-19: It was not as bad as we feared. Distance Education, 2021, vol. 42, iss. 1, pp. 164–172. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2020.1869529.
18. Naidu S. Building resilience in education systems post-COVID-19. Distance Education, 2021, vol. 42, iss. 1, pp. 1–4. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2021.1885092.
19. Li C., Lalani F. The COVID-19 pandemic has changed education forever. This is how. The World Economic Forum, 2020. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/coronavirus-education-global-covid19-online-digital-learning/ (accessed 05.02.2021).
20. Fidalgo P., Thormann J., Kulyk O., Lencastre J.A. Students’ perceptions on distance education: A multinational study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2020, vol. 17. doi: 10.1186/s41239-020-00194-2.
21. Adedoyin O.B., Soykan E. Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: The challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 2020, no. 28. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180.
22. Grjibovski A.M. Analiz nominal'nykh dannykh (nezavisimye nablyudeniya) [Analysis of nominal data (independent observations)]. Ekologiya cheloveka [Human Ecology], 2008, no. 6, pp. 58–68. (In Russian).

Show full text