Assessment of higher education system for region’s sustainable development

Abstract

Higher education plays an important role in promoting the concept of sustainable development and achieving the 2030 UN goals. In modern society, higher education institutions act as educational and research centers and impact the economy, politics, and social sphere of the region. At the same time, unlike the world's leading universities, Russian higher education institutions demonstrate a predominantly low level of involvement in the implementation of sustainable development. In this regard, the assessment of regional universities for sustainable development becomes relevant. Scientific novelty lies in the development of a system of assessment indicators and methods for the regional system of higher education for sustainable development. The methodology evaluates five functions of the higher education system by twenty-four indicators. An information base serves to be available statistical data for six years (2015–2020). The methodology is tested with the Volga Federal District regions. The study revealed that the higher education system in the Republic of Tatarstan achieves the highest level in its performance, while the higher education system in Kirov region and Udmurt Republic shows the lowest level. Perm Krai demonstrates an interfunctional imbalance and an insufficient level of development of the higher education system for the region’s sustainable development. Correlation analysis detected a statistically significant relationship between the performance of the higher education system in the region and its sustainable development. The article will be of interest to researchers of sustainable development problems of territories, students and graduate students examining this topic; state and municipal employees involved in the implementation of the region’s sustainable development.

Keywords: sustainable development, higher education, higher education system, higher education for sustainable development, functional approach, university functions, region, sustainable development of the region, Volga Federal District, Perm Krai

For citation

Kotomina O. V. Assessment of higher education system for region’s sustainable development. Perm University Herald. Economy, 2022, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 321–337. DOI 10.17072/1994-9960-2022-3-321-337

References

1. Tretyakova E. , Osipova M. Yu. Sochetanie staticheskogo i dinamicheskogo podkhodov v otsenke ustoichivogo razvitiya regional'nykh sotsial'no-ekonomicheskikh sistem [Combination of static and dynamic approaches to assessing sustainable development of regional socio-economic systems]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Ser. «Ekonomika» [Perm University Herald. ECONOMY], 2016, vol. 2, no. № 29, pp. 79–92. (In Russian). doi: 17072/1994-9960-2016-2-79-92
2. Ogurtsova E. V., Chelnokova O. Yu. Otsenka realizatsii bazovykh funktsii regional'nykh sistem vysshego obrazovaniya [Evaluation of realization of basic functions of regional systems of higher education]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo [Izv. Saratov University (New Series), Series Economics. Management. Law], 2018, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 169–175. (In Russian). doi: 18500/1994-2540-2018-18-2-169-175
3. Firsova A. A., Chernyshova G. Y. Mathematical Models for Evaluation of the Higher Education System Functions with DEA Approach. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Matematika. Informatika [Izv. Saratov University (New Series) Series Mathematics. Computer Science], 2019, vol. 19, iss. 3, pp. 351–362. doi: 10.18500/1816-9791-2019-19-3-351-362
4. Lozano R., Ceulemans K., Alonso-Almeida M., Huisingh D., Lozano F.J., Waas T., Lambrechts W., Lukamn R., Hugé J. A review of commitment and implementation of sustainable development in higher education: Results from a worldwide survey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, vol. 108, part A, pp. 1–18. doi: 1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.048
5. Findler F., Schönherr N., Lozano R., Stacherl B. Assessing the impacts of higher education institutions on sustainable development — An analysis of tools and indicators. Sustainability, 2019, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–19. doi: 3390/su11010059
6. Giesenbauer B., Müller-Christ G. University 4.0: Promoting the transformation of higher education institutions toward sustainable development. Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, no. 8, Article 3371. doi: 3390/su12083371
7. Chankseliani M., McCowan T. Higher education and the sustainable development goals. Higher Education, 2021, vol. 81, pp. 1–8. doi: 1007/s10734-020-00652-w
8. Fadeikina N. V., Grineva S. V., Saprykina O. A. Sozdanie innovatsionnoi obrazovatel'noi ekosistemy obrazovatel'noi organizatsii vysshego obrazovaniya kak neobkhodimoe uslovie povysheniya ee korporativnoi sotsial'noi otvetstvennosti [Creation of an innovative educational ecosystem of the educational organization of the higher education as necessary condition of increase its corporate social responsibility]. Sibirskaya finansovaya shkola [Siberian Financial School], 2018, no. 5 (130), pp. 57–72. (In Russian).
9. Kankovskaya A. R. Higher education for sustainable development: Challenges in Russia. Procedia CIRP, 2016, vol. 48, pp. 449–453. doi: 1016/j.procir.2016.03.153
10. Loktionova E. A., Khlebovich D. I. Universitet kak provodnik ustoichivogo razvitiya: zadachi, podkhody i praktika [University as a champion of sustainable development: Objectives, approaches and practice]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta im. G. V. Plekhanova [Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics], 2020, vol. 17, no. 6 (114), pp. 176–187. (In Russian). doi: 21686/2413-2829-2020-6-176-187
11. Vaughter P., Wright T., McKenzie M., Lidstone L. Greening the ivory tower: A review of educational research on sustainability in post-secondary education. Sustainability, 2013, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 2252–2271. doi: 3390/su5052252
12. Alghamdi N., Heijer A. den, Jonge H. de. Assessment tools’ indicators for sustainability in universities: An analytical overview. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 2017, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 84–115. doi: 1108/ijshe-04-2015-0071
13. Koehn P. H., Uitto J. I. Evaluating sustainability education: Lessons from international development experience. Higher Education, 2014, vol. 67, pp. 672–635. doi: 1007/s10734-013-9669-x
14. Leal Filho W., Ruiz Vargas V., Salvia A. L. [et al.]. The role of higher education institutions in sustainability initiatives at the local level. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, vol. 233, pp. 1004–1015. doi: 1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.059
15. Kotomina O. V. Funktsional'naya model' vliyaniya sistemy vysshego obrazovaniya na ustoichivoe razvitie regiona [Functional model of the higher education system impact on a region’s sustainable development]. Vestnik Permskogo natsional'nogo issledovatel'skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie nauki [PNRPU Sociology and Economics Bulletin], 2021, no. 3, pp. 241–256. (In Russian). doi: 15593/2224-9354/2021.3.17
16. Kotomina O. V. Vliyanie funktsionirovaniya sistemy vysshego obrazovaniya na ustoichivoe razvitie regiona [Impact of higher education system on region’s sustainable development]. Innovatsionnoe razvitie ekonomiki: tendentsii i perspektivy 2021 [Innovative Development of Economy: Trends and Perspectives]. Perm, Izd-vo Perm. nats. issled. politekhn. un-ta Publ., 2022, pp. 159–167. (In Russian).
17. Bebbington J., Russell S., Thomson I. Accounting and sustainable development: Reflections and propositions. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 2017, vol. 48, pp. 21–34. doi: 1016/j.cpa.2017.06.002
18. Shevchenko O. M. Monitoring razvitiya sistemy vysshego obrazovaniya regiona [Monitoring of the development of region’s higher education system]. Obuchenie i vospitanie: metodiki i praktika [Teaching and nurturing: Methodology and Practices], 2015, no. 20, pp. 149–153. (In Russian).
19. Novikov S. V. Funktsional'nye parametry tekhnicheskogo universiteta v kommunikatsionnoi modeli natsional'noi innovatsionnoi sistemy [Functional parameters of the technical university in the communicative model of the national innovation system]. Vestnik Ufimskogo gosudarstvennogo aviatsionnogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta [Scientific Journal of Ufa State Aviation Technical University], 2020, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 126–132. (In Russian).
20. Brusca I., Labrador M., Larran M. The challenge of sustainability and integrated reporting at universities: A case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, vol. 188, pp. 347–354. doi: 1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.292
21. Vargas V. R., Lawthom R., Prowse A., Randles S., Tzoulas K. Sustainable development stakeholder networks for organisational change in higher education institutions: A case study from the UK. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, vol. 208, pp. 470–478. doi: 1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.078
22. Konstantinova L. V. Sovremennyi universitet – universitet dlya obshchestva [Modern university – University for society]. Rossiya: Tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiya. Ezhegodnik. Vyp. 16 / otv. red. V. I. Gerasimov [Russia: Trends and Perspectives of Development. Annual Journal. Iss. 16. Ed. by V. I. Gerasimov]. Moscow, INION RAN Publ., 2021, part 1, pp. 800–803. (In Russian).
23. Burenina I. V., Byl' E. A. Reitingovaya sistema otsenki ustoichivogo razvitiya territorial'nykh sub"ektov: rossiiskii i mirovoi opyt [Rating assessment system of sustainable territorial development of regions: Russian and international experience]. Internet-zhurnal «Naukovedenie» [Science Studies Internet Journal], 2016, vol. 8, no. 2. (In Russian). doi: 15862/99EVN216
24. Ustoichivoe razvitie regionov i gorodov Povolzh'ya / pod red. S. M. Nikonorova, S. V. Solov'evoi, Sitkinoi [Sustainable development of the area and cities in Volga region. Eds. by S. M. Nikiforov, S. V. Solov’eva, K. S. Sitkina]. Moscow, Ekonom. f-t MGU im. M. V. Lomonosova Publ., 2020. 255 p. (In Russian).
25. Firsova A. A., Makarova E. L., Tugusheva R. R. Institutional management elaboration through cognitive modeling of the balanced sustainable development of regional innovation systems. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market and Complexity, 2020, vol. 6, no. 32. 3390/joitmc6020032

Show full text