Assessment of water use in the regions of Russia by water supply, efficiency, and sustainable development criteria

Authors

  • Valentina F. Fomina Komi Federal Science Centre of Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Socio-Economic and Energy Problems of the North https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0010-3723

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/1994-9960-2023-2-215-240

Abstract

Introduction. The 2018-2028 period is proclaimed to be an international Water for Sustainable Development Decade for Action in order to focus more attention on the SDGs as a part of the Agenda for Sustainable Development. Global trends to lower fresh water consumption rate, as well as unbiased evaluation of the 2020 Russian Federation Water Strategy determine the relevance of the efficient and sustainable development of water use in the country’s regions.

Purpose. The article refers to the criteria of water availability, efficiency, and sustainable development and compares the water use in federal districts.

Materials and Methods. The authors examined the data of Rosstat and the NIA-Prirоda. The data characterize water use and the economy in federal districts in 2007–2020. The study exploited the methods of statistical and comparative analysis, decoupling analysis based on the Diamond Decoupling model.

Results. The assessment of water availability by a water withdrawal share in renewable water resources (water stress index) shows a low level of water pressure in all districts. Unlike the Falkenmark index, specific water supply reveals no water tension factor holding back the economy growth. The study identifies a trend towards lower absolute and specific indicators of water intake and use. The changes in the structure of total water consumption are in line with the principles of rational use of resources. The study finds the indicators of productivity (in accordance with SDG 6.4.1) and intensity (GRP water intensity) of water intake, which are significantly affected by the development of circulating systems increasing the efficiency of water use. The article notes that in some regions, the target indicator of the Water Strategy was not reached due to a high decrease rate in water intake intensity. Decoupling analysis revealed a strong decoupling of economic growth from the use of water resources in all federal districts.

Conclusion. The criteria for reasonable, efficient and sustainable development, which supplement the integral indicator of the gross water capacity, have been developed and tested. This helps reveal that federal districts are highly differentiated by their water supply and the nature of water use. New findings should be taken into account when planning water management activities and may be useful in updating the 2035 Water Strategy of the Russian Federation.

Keywords: water supply, water withdrawal, water consumption, recycled water, water resource efficiency, water use intensity, water use efficiency, sustainable development, decoupling, federal districts

For citation

Fomina V. F. Assessment of water use in the regions of Russia by water supply, efficiency, and sustainable development criteria. Perm University Herald. Economy, 2023, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 215–240. DOI 10.17072/1994-9960-2023-2-215-240

References 

  1. Boretti A., Rosa L. Reassessing the projections of the World Water Development Report. Clean Water, 2019, vol. 2, article 15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-019-0039-9
  2. Danilov-Danil'yan V. I., Losev K. S. Potreblenie vody: ekologicheskii ekonomicheskii sotsial'nyi i politicheskii aspekty. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2006. 218 p. (In Russian).
  3. Burek P., Satoh Y., Fischer G., Kahil M. T., Scherzer A., Tramberend S., Nava L. F., Wada Y., Eisner S., Flörke M., Hanasaki N., Magnuszewski P., Cosgrove B., Wiberg D. Water Futures and Solution: Fast Track Initiative (Final Report). IIASA Working Paper WP-16-006. Laxenburg: IIASA, 2016. 113 p. Available at: https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/13008/1/WP-16-006.pdf (access date:01.2023).
  4. Ritchie H., Roser M. Water use and stress. Our World in Data, 2017. Available at: https://ourworldindata.org/water-use-stress (access date: 10.01.2023).
  5. Progress on change in water-use efficiency: Global status and acceleration needs for SDG Indicator 6.4.1. FAO, UN Water. Rome, 2021. 90 р. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb6413en
  6. Progress on Level of Water Stress: Global status and acceleration needs for SDG Indicator 6.4.2. FAO, UN Water. Rome, 2021. 95 p. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb6241en
  7. Danilov-Danil'yan V. I. Fresh water – the main constraint of the world economy development. Ekonomicheskie strategii = Economic Strategies, 2011, no. 3, pp. 98–100. (In Russian).
  8. Rumyantsev V. A., Koronkevich N. I., Izmailova A. V., Georgiadi A. G., Zaitseva I. S., Barabanova E. A., Drabkova V. G., Korneenkova N. Yu. Water resources of rivers, lakes and reservoirs of Russia and anthropogenic impacts on them. Izvestiya RAN. Seriya geograficheskaya = RAS News. Geography Series, 2021, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 120–135. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S258755662101012X
  9. Shiklomanov I. A., Babkin V. I., Balonishnikova Zh. A. Water resources, their use, and water availability in Russia: Current estimates and forecasts. Vodnye resursy = Water Resources, 2011, vol. 38, 2, pp. 131–141. (In Russian).
  10. Danilov-Danil'yan V. I. Vodnye resursy mira i perspektivy vodokhozyaistvennogo kompleksa Rossii. Moscow, LEVKO Publ., 2009. 88 p. (In Russian).
  11. Merzlikina Yu. B. Strategicheskoe razvitie vodnogo khozyaistva Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Yekaterinburg, 26 p. (In Russian). Available at: https://wrm.ru/frontend/web/image/wis/file/1575014132.pdf (access date: 03.05.2022).
  12. Fomina V. F. Vodoresursnaya sostavlyayushchaya sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya rossiiskikh regionov. Ispol'zovanie i okhrana prirodnykh resursov = Use and Exploitation of Natural Resources, 2010, no. 4 (112), pp. 22–27, no. 5 (113), pp. 20–23. (In Russian).
  13. Belyaev S. D. Russian water strategy 2020: Goals and results. Vodnoe khozyaistvo Rossii: problemy, technologii, upravlenie = Water Sector of Russia: Problems, Technologies Management, 2022, no. 1, pp. 5–24. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.35567/19994508_2022_1_1
  14. Byulleten' Schetnoi palaty Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Vodnye resursy = Water Resources, 2022, no. 5 (294). 126 p. (In Russian).
  15. Yakutseni S. P. Water: Resources, reserves, markets. Russian Mining Industry, 2022, no. 4, pp. 120–128. https://doi.org/10.30686/1609-9192-2022-4-120-128
  16. Mezhdunarodnaya vodnaya strategiya: sessiya I. Vodnaya strategiya dlya vodnoi derzhavy = Water Strategy for Water State, 2021, pp. 6–17. (In Russian). Available at: https://cceis.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/510742368 (access date:12.2022).
  17. Shiklomanov I. A., Markova O. L. Problemy vodnykh resursov i perebrosok stoka v mire. Leningrad, Gidrometeoizdat Publ., 1987. 196 p. (In Russian).
  18. Falkenmark M. The massive water scarcity now threatening Africa: Why isn’t it being addressed? Ambio, 1989, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 112–118.
  19. Finel N., Tapio P. Decoupling transport CO2 from GDP. Finland Futures Research Centre. FFRC eBOOK 1/2012. 42 p. Available at: https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2019052116441 (access date: 12.04.2021).
  20. Fomina V. F. Identifying the effect of decoupling in major economic sectors of the Komi Republic. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2022, vol. 15, iss. 1, pp. 176–193. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2022.1.79.9
  21. Izmailova A. V. Water availability and lake fund of water deficit regions. Vodnoe khozyaistvo Rossii = Water Sector of Russia, 2019, no. 5, pp. 6–24. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.35567/1999-4508-2019-5-1
  22. Rybak E. A., Rybak O. O. Analysis of regional features of water use structure in the North Caucasus. Part I. Water availability and water consumption. Sistemy kontrolya okruzhayushchei sredy = Monitoring Systems of Environment, 2021, no. 2 (44), pp. 96–105. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.33075/2220-5861-2021-2-96-105
  23. Demin А. P. Contemporary water intensity of the economics of the countries of the world. Izvestiya RAN. Seriya geograficheskaya = RAS News. Geography Series, 2012, no. 5, pp. 71–81. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.15356/0373-2444-2012-5-71-81
  24. Graham N. T., Hejazi M. I., Kim S. H., Davies E. G. R., Edmonds J. A., Miralles-Wilhelm F. Future changes in the trading of virtual water. Nature Communications, 2020, vol. 11, article 3632. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17400-4
  25. Tuninetti M., Ridolfi L., Laio F. Charting out the future agricultural trade and its impact on water resources. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, vol. 714, article 136626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136626
  26. Tausová M., Culková K., Kudelas D., Gabániová L., Kosco J., Mehana I. Evaluation of water resources through efficiency index and water productivity in EU. Energies, 2022, vol. 15 (23), article 9123. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15239123
Show full text

Information about the Author

  • Valentina F. Fomina, Komi Federal Science Centre of Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Socio-Economic and Energy Problems of the North

    Candidate of Engineering Sciences, Assistant Professor, Senior Research fellow at the Laboratory of Environmental Economics Problems

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

Issue

Section

Regional and industrial economies