Analytical review and systematization of available decarbonization options for oil and gas business

Abstract

Introduction. Global climate goals call for an urgent and substantial decrease in greenhouse gas emissions. Being both a producer and a consumer of energy resources, oil and gas business is responsible for a significant part of global emissions, but also has great capacities to lower its carbon footprint. Analysis of the existing literature revealed that a wide range of decarbonization options remains unsystematic, which complicates management and research activities in the field of low-carbon development of the oil and gas industry.

Purpose. This article is aimed at systematizing decarbonization options for oil and gas business.

Materials and Methods. The research refers to the publicly available resources. The materials are the academic papers about decarbonization, carbon neutrality, development of oil and gas business in the context of low carbon agenda, reports of the research and analytical international organizations, reports of the governmental organizations. The study applied the desk analysis methods, content analysis, decomposition, grouping, analysis (critical and comparative) and synthesis.

Results. The requirements and approaches to accounting for greenhouse gas emissions were analyzed, and the main sources of emissions in oil and gas production were identified. The fundamental concepts in relation to the decarbonization of the oil and gas business are systematized. The paper describes the proposed systematization of decarbonization options for the oil and gas business with the focus on a hierarchy from general areas of activity to groups of options, decarbonization options and specific technologies (techniques).

Conclusion. The research outlined four areas of decarbonization for oil and gas business: (1) improvement of operational activities; (2) transition to low-carbon energy sources; (3) work with associated components and production wastes; (4) application of corporate management methods. The paper describes the examples of compensation options available to oil and gas companies and distributes decarbonization options by production stages and by coverage areas.

Keywords: decarbonization, method, options, oil and gas business, systematization, analysis

For citation

Kuznetsova E. A., Riadinskaia A. P., Cherepovitsyna A. A. Analytical review and systematization of available decarbonization options for oil and gas business. Perm University Herald. Economy, 2023, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 292–310. DOI 10.17072/1994-9960-2023-3-292-310. EDN HWLDOE.

References 

1. Ilyinskii A. A., Kalinina O. V., Khasanov M. M., Afanasiev M. V., Saitova A. A. Decarbonization of the oil and gas complex: Priorities and organizational models of development. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka = The North and The Market: Forming the Economic Order, 2022, vol. 25, no. 1 (75), pp. 33–46. (In Russian). DOI 10.37614/2220-802X.1.2022.75.003. EDN WOEZOW.
2. Kholodionova A. S., Kulik A. A. Key decarbonization aspects of Russian petroleum industry. Ekspozitsiya Neft' Gaz = Exposition Oil Gas, 2022, no. 7, pp. 102–106. (In Russian). DOI 10.24412/2076-6785-2022-7-102-106. EDN KYSPKT.
3. Telegina E. A., Chapaikin D. A. Directions of the energy transition in the policy of global oil and gas companies. Problemy prognozirovaniya = Problems of Forecasting, 2022, no. 5 (194), pp. 129–138. (In Russian). DOI 10.47711/0868-6351-194-129-138. EDN JSZOJA.
4. Arkhipova U. A. Decarbonization as the main ESC-transformation trend of the gas industry: Experience of Yamal LNG. Khronoekonomika = HronoEconomics, 2022, no. 2 (36), pp. 6–10. (In Russian). EDN RVSEJL.
5. Comyns B. Determinants of GHG Reporting: An Analysis of Global Oil and Gas Companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 2016, vol. 136, pp. 349–369. DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2517-9.
6. Sheveleva N. A. Decarbonization strategies and methods for oil and gas sector. Zashchita okruzhayushchei sredy v neftegazovom komplekse = Environmental Protection in Oil and Gas Complex, 2023, vol. 2, no. 311, pp. 25–31. (In Russian). DOI 10.33285/2411-7013-2023-2(311)-25-31. EDN BOZSXV.
7. Kenner D., Heede R. White knights, or horsemen of the apocalypse? Prospects for Big Oil to align emissions with a 1.5 ℃ pathway. Energy Research & Social Science, 2021, vol. 79, Article 102049. DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102049.
8. Green J., Hadden J., Hale T., Mahdavi P. Transition, hedge, or resist? Understanding political and economic behavior toward decarbonization in the oil and gas industry. Review of International Political Economy, 2022, vol. 29, iss. 6, pp. 2036–2063. DOI 10.1080/09692290.2021.1946708.
9. Cherepovitsyn A., Rutenko E. Strategic Planning of Oil and Gas Companies: The Decarbonization Transition. Energies, 2022, vol. 15, no. 17, Article 6163. DOI 10.3390/en15176163.
10. Shojaeddini E., Naimoli S., Ladislaw S., Bazilian M. Oil and gas company strategies regarding the energy transition. Progress in Energy, vol. 1, iss. 1, Article 012001. DOI 10.1088/2516-1083/ab2503.
11. Lu H., Guo L., Zhang Y. Oil and gas companies’ low-carbon emission transition to integrated energy companies. Science of The Total Environment, 2019, vol. 686, pp. 1202–1209. DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.014.
12. Kabeyi M. J. B., Olanrewaju O. A. Sustainable energy transition for renewable and low carbon grid electricity generation and supply. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2022, vol. 9, Article 743114. DOI 10.3389/fenrg.2021.743114.
13. Martins F., Moura P., de Almeida A. T. The Role of Electrification in the Decarbonization of the Energy Sector in Portugal. Energies, 2022, vol. 15, no. 5, Article 1759. DOI 10.3390/en15051759.
14. Wimbadi R. W., Djalante R. From decarbonization to low carbon development and transition: A systematic literature review of the conceptualization of moving toward net-zero carbon dioxide emission (1995–2019). Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, vol. 256, Article 120307. DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120307.
15. Samatova T. B. Lean oil refining as an area of lean production development. Moskovskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal = Moscow Economic Journal, 2021, no. 7, Article 10400. (In Russian). DOI 10.24412/2413-046X-2021-10400.
16. Gangar N., Macchietto S., Markides C. N. Recovery and utilization of low-grade waste heat in the oil-refining industry using heat engines and heat pumps: An international technoeconomic comparison. Energies, 2020, vol. 13, no. 10, Article 2560. DOI 10.3390/en13102560.
17. Matos C. R., Carneiro J. F., Silva P. P. Overview of large-scale underground energy storage technologies for integration of renewable energies and criteria for reservoir identification. Journal of Energy Storage, 2019, vol. 21, pp. 241–258. DOI 10.1016/j.est.2018.11.023.
18. Khorasani M., Sarker S., Kabir G., Ali S. M. Evaluating strategies to decarbonize oil and gas supply chain: Implications for energy policies in emerging economies. Energy, 2022, vol. 258, Article 124805. DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124805.
19. Riadinskaia A. P., Cherepovitsyna A. A. Utilization of associate petroleum gas in Russia: Methods and prospects for the production of gas chemistry products. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka = The North and The Market: Forming the Economic Order, 2022, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 19–34. (In Russian). DOI 10.37614/2220-802X.2.2022.76.002. EDN PPTTXQ.
20. Afanas'ev S. V., Kravtsova M. V., Pais M. A., Nosrev N. S. Analiz metodov pererabotka nefteshlamov. Problemy i resheniya. Innovatsii i «zelenye» tekhnologii, 2019, Samara, SNC RAN, pp. 22–27. (In Russian).
21. Alsudani F. T. et al. Fisher–Tropsch synthesis for conversion of methane into liquid hydrocarbons through gas-to-liquids (GTL) process: A review. Methane, 2023, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 24–43. DOI 10.3390/methane2010002.
22. Kawai E., Ozawa A., Leibowicz B. D. Role of carbon capture and utilization (CCU) for decarbonization of industrial sector: A case study of Japan. Applied Energy, 2022, vol. 328, Article 120183. DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120183.
23. Hannan M. A., Faisal M., Pin Jern Ker, Begum R. A., Dong Z. Y., Zhang C. Review of optimal methods and algorithms for sizing energy storage systems to achieve decarbonization in microgrid applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2020, vol. 131, Article 110022. DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110022.
24. Maestre V. M., Ortiz A., Ortiz I. Challenges and prospects of renewable hydrogen-based strategies for full decarbonization of stationary power applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, vol. 152, Article 111628. DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111628.
25. Misztal A., Kowalska M., Fajczak-Kowalska A., Strunecky O. Energy Efficiency and Decarbonization in the Context of Macroeconomic Stabilization. Energies, 2021, vol. 14, no. 16, Article 5197. DOI 10.3390/en14165197.
26. Stolbovoy V. S. Regenerative agriculture and climate change mitigation. Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK = Achievements of Science and technology of AIC, 2020, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 19–26. (In Russian). DOI 10.24411/0235-2451-2020-10703. EDN HOCVJH.
27. Stroikov G. A., Cherepovitsyn A. E., Romasheva N. V., Kuznetsova E. A., Podolyanets L. A. Tekushchee sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya uglerodnogo regulirovaniya v Rossii. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo = Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship, 2022, no. 10 (147), pp. 295–303. (In Russian). DOI 10.34925/EIP.2022.147.10.054. EDN GVTMEY.
28. Matemilola S., Salami H. A. Net Zero Emission. Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management, 2020, pp. 1–6. DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-02006-4_512-1.
29. Chen J. M. Carbon neutrality: Toward a sustainable future. The Innovation, 2021, vol. 2, iss. 3, Article 100127. DOI 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100127.
30. Sun P., Cappello V., Elgowainy A., Vyawahare P., Ma O., Podkaminer K., Rustagi N., Koleva M., Melaina M. An Analysis of the Potential and Cost of the U.S. Refinery Sector Decarbonization. Environmental Science & Technology, 2023, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 1411–1424. DOI 10.1021/acs.est.2c07440.
31. Holmes K. J., Zeitler E., Kerxhalli-Kleinfield M., DeBoer R. Scaling deep decarbonization technologies. Earth’s Future, 2021, vol. 9, iss. 11, e2021EF002399. DOI 10.1029/2021EF002399.

Show full text