Trade openness of the Russian regions: Transformations over time and influence of border location

Authors

  • Anastasia V. Vasilieva Karelian Research Centre of the RAS (Institute of Economics)
  • Marina V. Moroshkina Karelian Research Centre of the RAS (Institute of Economics)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/1994-9960-2023-4-374-388

Abstract

Introduction. The foreign economic activity of Russia is significantly changing in the current geopolitical context. At the same time, the Russian regions are unevenly integrated into foreign markets.

Purpose. The paper aims at assessing trade openness of the regions in terms of their transformations with the focus on the border regions which are considered to be potential leaders of the foreign trade.

Materials and Methods. Trade openness of the Russian regions was analyzed with statistical indicators for exports and imports in 2010, 2015, and 2021. A hierarchical cluster analysis defined typology by the regions’ openness. This methodological approach deepened the analysis of the regions’ trade openness, including the border ones, and helped to comply cartographic models for the spatial organizations of the regions in question.

Results. The study shows a relative stability of the leading, middle and lagging regions by their trade openness for the period under review. The leaders were characterized as the regions with high socio-economic indicators and developed infrastructure, as well as the cities of federal significance, while the regions with low indicators for socio-economic development turned out to be the outsiders. From a geographical perspective, changes in foreign trade activity in general and in different parts of the border are determined. The border location opportunities turned out to be not fully implemented in many parts of the border, although the study revealed that the regions located in various sections of the border showed the highest level of trading activity in time periods under analysis, which could also be explained by the geopolitical factor.

Conclusion. The results of the study demonstrate the transformation of the Russian space in terms of the regions’ economic openness. The proposed methodological tools can be used to continue monitoring these changes, especially in the current period of geopolitical shocks, to develop the most appropriate management decisions in setting the goals and priorities of foreign economic policy, including the ones at the regional level.

Keywords: region, border region, center, periphery, economic openness, trade openness, economic security, foreign trade, transformation of regional economic systems, typology

For citation

Vasilieva A. V., Moroshkina M. V. Trade openness of the Russian regions: Transformations over time and influence of border location. Perm University Herald. Economy, 2023, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 374–388. DOI 10.17072/1994-9960-2023-4-374-388. EDN NXRITM.

References

  1. Artemova O. V., Abramkina S. R. Razvitie regionov Rossiiskoi Federatsii v usloviyakh usileniya otkrytosti natsional'noi ekonomiki. Sotsium i vlast' = Society and Power, 2010, no. 2 (26), pp. 85–89. (In Russ.). EDN MUPZON.
  2. Aganbegyan A.G. To sustainable socio-economic growth. Nauchnye trudy Vol'nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii = Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia, 2021, vol. 230, no. 4, pp. 133–155. (In Russ.). DOI 10.38197/2072-2060-2021-230-4-133-155. EDN WFEDPN.
  3. Izotov D. А. Influence of foreign economic activity on the economic growth of Russian regions. Ekonomika regiona = Economy of Region, 2018, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1450–1462. (In Russ.). DOI 10.17059/2018-4-30. EDN YRQAFN.
  4. Grinberg R. S., Pylin A. G. Eurasian Economic Union: Key development trends amid global uncertainty. Ekonomika regiona = Economy of Region, 2020, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 340–351. (In Russ.). DOI 10.17059/2020-2-1. EDN SGBXOM.
  5. Harrison A. Openness and growth: A time-series, cross-country analysis for developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 1996, vol. 48, issue 2, pp. 419–447. DOI 10.1016/0304-3878(95)00042-9.
  6. Frankel J., Romer D. Trade and Growth: An Empirical Investigation. NBER Working Paper, 1996, no. 5476. 51 p. DOI 10.3386/w5476.
  7. Sala-i-Martin X. I just ran two million regressions. American Economic Review, 1997, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 178–183.
  8. Spence M. The Next Convergence: The Future of Economic Growth in a Multispeed World. New York, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011. 320 p.
  9. Helpman E. Understanding Global Trade. Harvard University Press, 2011. 232 p.
  10. Sinelnikov-Murylev S. G., Perevyshin Yu. N., Trunin P. V. Inflation differences in the Russian regions: An empirical analysis. Ekonomika regiona = Economy of Region, 2020, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 479–493. (In Russ.). DOI 10.17059/2020-2-11. EDN DETTMX.
  11. Ezcurra R., Rodríguez-Pose A. Trade Openness and Spatial Inequality in Emerging Countries. Spatial Economic Analysis, 2014, vol. 9, issue 2, pp. 162–182. DOI 10.1080/17421772.2014.891155.
  12. Alexandre F., Costa H., Portela M., Rodrigues M. Asymmetric regional dynamics in the Portuguese economy: Debt, openness and local revenues. Regional Studies, 2021, vol. 55, issue 2, pp. 322–332. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2020.1802004.
  13. Johansen U., Egging R., Ivanova O. Regional policy and the role of interregional trade data: Policy simulations with a model for Norway. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2018, vol. 5, issue 1, pp. 312–331. DOI 10.1080/21681376.2018.1522967.
  14. Suslov V. I., Kovaleva G. D. Global and national factors influencing regional export and import on the example of the Siberian Federal District. Ekonomika regiona = Economy of Region, 2021, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1302–1317. (In Russian). DOI 10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-4-18. EDN PDUGJX.
  15. Izotov D. A. External and internal trade barriers of the Russian Far East. Ekonomika regiona = Economy of Region, 2021, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1318–1331. (In Russ.). DOI 10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-4-19. 1. EDN SELGLA.
  16. Minakir P. А. Eastern vector of development: New challenges and expectations. Regionalistika = Regionalistics, 2023, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 67–73. (In Russ.). DOI 10.14530/reg.2023.1.67. EDN PNCATE.
  17. Minakir P. А. The foreign trade factor of the force major economy: A spatial maneuver. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2023, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 7–19. (In Russ.). DOI 10.14530/se.2023.1.007-019. EDN GYFIPY.
  18. Ushkalova D. I. Russia’s foreign trade under sanctions pressure. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii = Journal of the New Economic Association, 2022, no. 3 (55), pp. 218–226. (In Russ.). DOI 10.31737/2221-2264-2022-55-3-14. EDN OGZSKI.
  19. Vasilyeva R. I., Voitenkov V. A., Urazbaeva A. R. Modelling of the influence of regional determinants on export diversification in Russia. Journal of Applied Economic Research, 2022, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 79–100. (In Russ.). DOI 10.15826/vestnik.2022.21.1.004. EDN ZTFUQR.
  20. Kapustina L. M. Transformatsiya vneshneekonomicheskikh i mezhregional'nykh svyazei sub"ektov Federatsii v usloviyakh liberalizatsii vneshnei torgovli. Journal of New Economy, 2001, no. 4, pp. 74–79. (In Russ.). EDN MVZXSP.
  21. Novikova А. А. Evaluation of changes in the international and interregional economic openness of the Russian exclave on the Baltic. Geopolitika i ekogeodinamika regionov = Geopolitics and ecogeodynamics of regions, 2020, vol. 6 (16), no. 1, pp. 13–30. (In Russ.). EDN SXEMBU.
  22. Kashbraziev R. V., Stepin А. G. The spatial aspect of assessing the foreign trade potential of Russian regions (chorological approach). Izvestiya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriya geograficheskaya = Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Geography Series, 2021, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 857–869. (In Russ.). DOI 10.31857/S2587556621060091. EDN CNEHTW.
  23. Voloshenko K. Y., Novikova А. А. Methodological features of the formation of a data system for assessing regional freight flows (the Kalinigrad region case). Regionalistika = Regionalistics, 2019, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 127–141. (In Russ.). DOI 10.14530/reg.2019.6.127. EDN QXFQYG.
  24. Fedorov G. M. The economy of Russian Baltic regions: Development level and dynamics, structure and international trade partners. Baltiiskii region = Baltic Region, 2022, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 20–38. (In Russ.). DOI 10.5922/2079-8555-2022-4-2. EDN QYCBII.
  25. Zverev Yu. М., Mezhevich N. М. The Republic of Belarus and the Kaliningrad region of Russia as a sub-regional security complex. Baltiiskii region = Baltic Region, 2022, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 64–82. DOI 10.5922/2079-8555-2022-3-4. EDN SQTQZW.
  26. Vorozheina Ya. A., Klemeshev A. P., Komleva N. A., Druzhinin A. G., Belozerov V. K., Fedorov G. M., Voloshenko K. Yu. Geopolitical security of Russia: Remarks on the problem statement. Baltiiskii region = Baltic Region, 2023, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 153–169. (In Russ.). DOI 10.5922/2079-8555-2023-1-9. EDN YGFCOQ.
  27. Druzhinin A. G., Ibragimov A. I., Mutluer M. The South Caucasus as one of the priority areas of the Russian-Turkish cooperation in modern Eurasia. Nauchnaya mysl' Kavkaza = Scientific Thought of Caucasus, 2021, no. 2 (106), pp. 20–30. (In Russ.). DOI 10.18522/2072-0181-2021-106-2-20-30. EDN WAJJNU.
  28. Druzhinin A. G., Ismailov Ch. N., Gontar N. V. Interaction Russian and Azerbaijan the Caspian region: Opportunities, barriers, priorities. Nauchnaya mysl' Kavkaza = Scientific Thought of Caucasus, 2021, no. 3 (107), pp. 25–38. (In Russ.). DOI 10.18522/2072-0181-2021-107-3-25-38. EDN IKJMGJ.
  29. Karpenko M. S., Kolosov V. A., Sebentsov A. B. Transformatsiya rossiisko-kazakhstanskogo pogranich'ya v postsovetskii period: institutsional'noe i ekonomicheskoe izmereniya. Problemy natsional'noi strategii = Issues of National Strategies, 2021, no. 5 (68), pp. 25–40. (In Russ.). DOI 10.52311/2079-3359_2021_5_25. EDN XFTQDL.
  30. Mongush S. P. Foreign trade activity as the basis of interregional collaborative engagement in the management system: Evidence from the Tyva Republic as a participant of the Yenisey Siberia Comprehensive Investment Project. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' = National Interests: Priorities and Security, 2022, vol. 18, no. 3 (408), pp. 544–565. (In Russ.). DOI 10.24891/ni.18.3.544. EDN GJZZNV.
  31. Izotov D. А. Foreign trade design in the Russian Far East: Dynamics, structure, challenges. Regionalistika = Regionalistics, 2020, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 39–52. (In Russ.). DOI 10.14530/reg.2020.5.39. EDN IBSNTD.
  32. Vardomsky L. B. Russian-Chinese economic links in the context of growing international tension. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii = Journal of the New Economic Association, 2023, no. 1 (58), pp. 142–148. (In Russ.). DOI 10.31737/22212264_2023_1_142. EDN HKFHSZ.
Show full text

Information about the Authors

  • Anastasia V. Vasilieva, Karelian Research Centre of the RAS (Institute of Economics)

    Candidate of Economic Sciences, Senior Researcher

  • Marina V. Moroshkina, Karelian Research Centre of the RAS (Institute of Economics)

    Candidate of Economic Sciences, Senior Researcher

Downloads

Published

2023-12-27

Issue

Section

Regional and industrial economies