Gender power institute concept as a trend to develop methods of gender economics: Theoretical background of the issue
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/1994-9960-2017-3-375-387Abstract
The concept, that analyses economic nature of power relationship between men and women, has been developed on the basis of synthesis of institutional economic theory tools, feminist economics and hierarchical analysis. These power relationships determine the status of men and women in a family and society economy as well as the choice of possible models of behavior. The fundamental issues of the author’s concept are: 1) internal determinacy of dependence of an economic agent-object on an agent-subject; 2) unequal evaluation of resources of a subject and an object of gender power and gender asymmetrical distribution of economic resources; 3) institutional restrictions of hierarchy of gender power distribution are the factor of its reproduction at each level of an economic system; 4) opportunities to realize human capital of men and women are restricted within the limits of institutional roles given by the system of gender power institutes; 5) internal non-coordination of the advanced power disposition reduces the quality of functioning of the whole hierarchical system of gender power institutes and is projected to the level of its interaction with social-economic system in general. The categorical apparatus of feminist economics has been specified and the author has suggested the interpretation of the following categories: gender power, an institute of gender power, institutional role of a subject of gender interaction. The opportunity to apply the postulates of the author’s concept in practice has been demonstrated in the case study of the analysis of the current system of gender power institutes in Russia. The main characteristics of inefficiency of the present system of institutes have been structured. Among them are formal washing out of power borders in macrolevel institutes and strengthening of gender power concentration in microlevel institutes, uniformity of power disposition for subjects, who are at the same hierarchy level, the aims and functions of institutes of different hierarchy level are not coherent, population is not informed enough about forms and facts of gender power manifestation, there are no inverse and horizontal relations among the system elements. The stages to define the strategic imperatives of gender power institutes system of elitist type in modern Russia have been indicated. They are 1) to study peculiarities of possible strategies of institute changes; 2) to specify determinants of quality of gender power institute system; 3) to reveal the nature and to substantiate the importance to change the current system of gender power institutes from the view point of economic agents (men and women); 4) to determine the functioning trajectory and scenario of gender power institutes of elitist type.
Keywordsgender power, gender power institute, concept, methodology, gender economy, hierarchical analysis, efficiency, agents, order, structure
For citationBazueva E.V. Gender power institute concept as a trend to develop methods of gender economics: Theoretical background of the issue. Perm University Herald. Economy, 2017, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 375–387. DOI 10.17072/1994-9960-2017-3-375-387
References1. Staveren I. Feminist Economics: Setting out the Parameters. Available at: http://repub.eur.nl/pub/22542/FemKritikpolOeko.pdf (accessed 15.04.2014).
2. Acker J. Inequality Regimes: Gender, Class, and Race in Organizations. Gender and Society, 2006, vol. 20, no. 4. Available at: www.sagepub.com/oswcondensed/study/articles/05/Acker.pdf (accessed 20.12.2013).
3. Padmanablan M. Gender and Institutional Analysis. A Feminist Approach to Economic and Social Norms. Working Paper, no. 91. August 2010. Available at: http://www.wifa.uni-leipzig.de/fileadmin/user_upload/AP/UL-Wifa_AP91_Martina_Padmanabhan.pdf (accessed 19.12.2013).
4. Kabeer N., Subrahmanian R. Institutions, Relations and Outcomes: Framework and Tools for Gender-Aware Planning. London, Zed Books, 2001. Available at: https://www.ids.ac.uk/files/Dp357.pdf (accessed 20.12. 2013).
5. Goetz A.M. Getting Institutions Right for Women in Development. London, Zed Books, 1997. 248 p.
6. Sweetman C. Feminist Economics. Available at: http://www.eif.gov.cy/mlsi/dl/genderequality.nsf/0/12D2A22FAC60DA74C22579A6002D950A/$file/fp2p_.feminist_economics_bp_english.pdf (accessed 14.12.2013).
7. Krook M.L., Mackay F. Introduction: Gender, Politics and Institutions In: Gender, Politics and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. M.L. Krook and F. Mackay eds. Palgrave Macmillian UK, 2011, pp. 1–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230303911.
8. Kenny M. Gender, Institutions and Power: A Critical Review. Politics, 2007, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 91–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9256.2007.00284.x.
9. Elson D. Labour Markets as Gendered Institutions: Equality, Efficiency and Empowerment Issues. World Development, 1999, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 611–627.
10. Sainsbury D. Gender and Social-democratic Welfare Stares In: Gender and welfare state regimes. D. Sainsbury eds. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999, pp. 75–116.
11. Beyeler M., Annesley C. Gendering the Institutional Reform of the Welfare State: Germany, the United Kingdom, and Switzerland In: Gender, Politics and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. M.L. Krook and eds. Palgrave Macmillian UK, 2011, pp. 79–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230303911.
12. Connell R.W. Gender. Cambridge, Polity Press, 2002. 184 p.
13. Budaeva M.B. Osobennosti gendernykh otnoshenii v al'ternativnykh ekonomicheskikh sistemakh. Avtoref. diss. kand. ekon. nauk [Peculiarities of Gender Relations in Alternative Economic Systems. Cand. econ. sci author. diss.]. St. Petersburg, 2007. 23 p. (In Russian).
14. Dement’ev V. V. Ekonomika kak sistema vlasti [Economy as the System of Power]. Donetsk, Kashtan Publ., 2003. 389 p. (In Russian).
15. Perskii Yu.K., Shchul'ts D.N. Ierarkhicheskii analiz ekonomiki: metody i modeli [Hierarchical Analysis of Economics: Methods and Models]. Ekaterinburg, Institute of Economics, The Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 2008. 203 р. (In Russian).
16. Kleiner G. Evolyutsiya institutsionalnyih sistem [The Evolution of Institutional Systems]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2004. 240 р. (In Russian).
17. Bazueva E.V. Vlast' kak predmet issledovaniya gendernoi ekonomiki [Power as the Subject of Gender Economics Research]. Zhenshchina v rossiiskom obshchestve [Woman in Russian Society], 2011, no. 2, pp. 3–14. (In Russian).
18. Eucken W. Osnovnye printsipy ekonomicheskoi politiki [Fundamental Principles of Economic Policy]. Transl. from German, ed. L. Tsedilina, Y. Kukolev. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1995. 496 p. (In Russian).
19. Connel R.W. Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. Cambridge, Polity, 1987. 352 p.
20. Bazueva E.V. Perskii Yu.K. Gendernaya ekonomika kak ierarkhicheskaya sistema [Gender Economics as a Hierarchical System]. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoi teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 2011, no. 2, pp. 7–20. (In Russian).
21. Bazueva E.V. Institut gendernoi vlasti kak kriterii effektivnosti razvitiya sovremennogo obshchestva [Thе Institute of Gender Power as the Criterion of Modern Development Efficiency]. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Vestnik of Orenburg State University], 2012, no. 8 (144), pp. 4–11. (In Russian).
22. Lebedeva N.N. Institutsional'nyi mekhanizm ekonomiki: sushchnost', struktura, razvitie [Institutional Mechanism of Economy: Nature, Structure, Development]. Volgograd, Volgograd State University Publ., 2002. 326 p. (In Russian).
23. Mezoekonomika perekhodnogo perioda: Rynki, otrasli, predpriyatiya: pod obshch. red. G.B. Kleinera [Mesoeconomics of Transition Period: Markets, Branches, Enterprises. Ed. by G.B. Kleiner]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2001. 516 p. (In Russian).
24. Butler J. The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford, California, Stanford University Press, 1997. 218 p.
25. Ozhigova L.N. Psikhologiya gendernoi identichnosti lichnosti [Psycology of Gender Identity]. Krasnodar: Kuban State University Publ., 2006. 290 p. (In Russian).
26. Bazueva E.V. The Human Capital of Perm Region: Gender Peculiarities of Realization. Ehkonomika regiona [Economy of a Region], 2010, no. 2 (22), pp. 60–71.
27. North D. Ponimanie protsessa ekonomicheskikh izmenenii. Per. s angl. K. Martynova, N. Edel'mana [Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Transl. from Engl. by K. Martynov, N. Edel'man]. Moscow, State University of Higher School of Economics Publ., 2010. 256 p. (In Russian).
28. Bazueva E.V. Transformation of Gender Power Disposition in Modern Families as a Driving Force of Institutional Changes. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2014, no. 4 (34), pp. 148–164.
29. Bazueva E.V. O traektorii razvitiya sistemy gendernoi vlasti egalitarnogo tipa v Rossii [On the Development Path of the Institutions of Egalitarian Type of Gender Power in Russia]. Ars Administrandi, 2015, no. 2, pp. 16–35. (In Russian).