Management models of cyberphysical organizations as strategic competitive competences of national economies

Abstract

The transformation of science in one of the leading productive forces of industrialized countries in the second half of the 20th century under the influence of deployment of scientific-technical revolution objectively gave impulse to the development of production automation and informatization of modern industrial economies. As a result, complexes of service industries have been developing in the economies of the industrialized countries. Science-intensive services and high-end technologies started developing in the structure of these complexes at the beginning of the XXI century. The fact that science-intensive services complexes have become leading branches of GNP of industrial countries has increased the role of intellectual innovative factors in competitive struggle. Science-intensive goods and services, intellectual property, complex intangible assets become special strategic competitive competencies (abilities) of business (firms), corporate, national economic systems in the competitive environment of the market economy. Models and systems of the management of economies are playing a key role among the present strategic competitive competencies in the mechanism of competitiveness of an enterprise, corporation, national and regional economies. Thus, the aim of the study is to extend the comprehension of digital economy as an economic system where technological restructuring develops competitive competences of cyber-physical organizations that create modern management models corresponding to competitiveness features in high-tech manufacturing. The research is based on the following methods: study and generalization, analysis and synthesis, system approach, combination of historical and logical approaches, methodological tools of management theory. The study has substantiated that the assimilation of cyber-physical technologies by organizations in industrial countries is accompanied by the competitiveness increase among the countries and companies for more profitable spheres of capital investment and impact, sales markets, technological resources. Moreover, the assimilation stimulates the transition to digital economy. The competitive struggle is accompanied by the relative decrease of importance of low natural competitive advantages and by the increased role of high innovation competitive ones. In its turn it demands the development of corresponding high innovation competitive advantages of firms, corporations, national economies considering cyber-physical technological restructuring. Innovation models of management systems of cyber-physical organizations become key factors among the high competitive advantages of countries and companies. Besides the studies devoted to perspectives and challenges of the transition to digital economy should consider breakthrough in new technologies and production types and should aim at dialectical interrelation of success of their development with corresponding modernization of systems of the organization and management of these technologies and productions taking into account competitive struggle.

Keywords

competitiveness, competitive advantages, strategic competitive competences, cyber-physical organizations, management models, digital economy, fourth industrial revolution, technological restructuring, high-tech manufacturing, digital economic system

For citation

Prudsky V.G. Management models of cyberphysical organizations as strategic competitive competences of national economies. Perm University Herald. Economy, 2018, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 433–450. DOI 10.17072/1994-9960-2018-3-433-450

Acknowledgements

The study was financially supported by the RFFI in the framework of scientific project No. 18-001-00001 “Development of management model of cyber-physical organizations” and according to the public task of Federal Agency for Scientific Organizations to Institute of Economics of the Ural branch of the Russian Academy of Science for 2018.

References

1. Komissarov A. Chetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya: o tom, kak ne opozdat' k novoi smene industrial'noi paradigmy [The fourth industrial revolution: How not to miss the industrial paradigm shift]. Vedomosti [News]. 13.10.2015. (In Russian) Available at: https://www.vedomosti.ru/ opinion/articles/2015/10/14/612719-promishlennaya-revolyutsiya (accessed 15.08.2018).
2. Borisova E. Chetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya v deistvii [The fourth industrial revolution in its functioning]. Muzhskaya rabota [Male Job], no. 63. 03.03.2018. (In Russian) Available at: http://www.menswork.ru/?q=%D0%B6%D1%83%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BB/63 (accessed 15.08.2018).
3. Schwab K. Chetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya. Per. s angl. [The fourth industrial revolution. Transl. from Engl.]. Moscow, “E” Publ., 2017. 208 p. (In Russian).
4. Kalinovskii A. Nemetskaya industriya 4.0 vs amerikanskii konsortsium promyshlennogo Interneta [German industry 4.0 vs American consortium]. Delovye novosti [Business News]. (In Russian) Available at: http://e-news.com.ua/show/420067.html (accessed 15.08.2018).
5. Ermak S., Lopatina T., Tolmachev D. Apgreid [Upgrade]. Ekspert Ural [Expert Ural], no. 27 (769), 02.07.2018, pp. 15–22. (In Russian).
6. Shekhovtsev M. Chto sulit miru Internet veshchei [What Internet of goods will bring people]. Ekspert [Expert], no. 48, 28.11–04.12.2016, pp. 20–27. (In Russian).
7. Kovalenko A. Odna iz samykh masshtabnykh [One of the most scaled]. Ekspert Ural [Expert Ural], no. 29–32 (771), 18.07–12.12.2018, pp. 15–22. (In Russian).
8. Tolkachev S. Dve modeli neoindustrializatsii: Germaniya – «Industriya 4.0», SSHA – «Promyshlennyi internet» [Two models of neoindustrialization: Germany – “Industry 4.04”, the USA – “Industrial Internet”]. Ekonomist [Economist], 2015, no. 9, pp. 13–23. (In Russian).
9. Yastreb N.A. Industriya 4.0: kiberfizicheskie sistemy i Internet veshchei [Industry 4.0: Cyber-physical systems and Internet of goods]. Chelovek v tekhnicheskoi srede [Human in Technological Environment]. Vologda, VoGU Publ., 2015, vol. 2, pp. 136–141. (In Russian).
10. Tsifrovaya revolyutsiya. Milliard let onlain. Kakoe mesto v nashei zhizni zanimaet internet [Digital revolution. Milliard of yeas online. What place the Internet takes in our life]. Russkii reporter [Russian Reporter], no. 8–9 (447–448), 23.04–21.05 2018, pp. 52–55. (In Russian).
11. Dmitrienko I. Konkurent s zheleznoi khvatkoi [Competitor with a strong grip]. Profil'. Ezhenedel'nyi zhurnal [Profile. Daily Magazine], no. 24 (40). 25.06.2018, pp. 6–11. (In Russian) Available at: www.profile.ru (accessed 15.08.2018).
12. Klinov V. Sdvigi v mirovoi ekonomike v XXI veke: problemy i perspektivy razvitiya [Upheaval in the distribution of power in the world economy: Problems and outlook of the world economy to 2050]. Voprosy ekonomiki [Issues of Economics], 2017, no. 7, pp. 114–127. (In Russian).
13. Idrisov G.I., Knyaginin V.N., Kudrin A.L., Rozhkova E.S. Novaya tekhnologicheskaya revolyutsiya i vozmozhnosti dlya Rossii [New technological revolution: Challenges and opportunities for Russia]. Voprosy ekonomiki [Issues of Economics], 2018, no. 4, pp. 5–25. (In Russian).
14. Mau V.A. Na iskhode global'nogo krizisa: ekonomicheskie zadachi 2017–2019 gg. [At the final stage of the global crisis: Economic tasks for 2017–2019]. Voprosy ekonomiki [Issues of Economics], 2018, no. 3, pp. 5–29. (In Russian).
15. Glaz'ev S. Kak obuzdat' gegemona [How to suppress a predominant leader]. Ekspert [Expert], no. 25, 18.06–24.06.2018, pp. 36–38. (In Russian).
16. Porter M.E. Konkurentsiya. Per. s angl. [Competiotion. Trans. from Engl.] Moscow, Vil'yams Publ., 2006. 608 p. (In Russian).
17. Porter M.E. Konkurentnoe preimushchestvo: Kak dostich' vysokogo rezul'tata i obespechit' ego ustoichivost'. Per. s angl. E. Kalinina [Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Transl. from Engl. by E. Kalinina]. Moscow. Al'pina Biznes Buks Publ., 2006. 715 p. (In Russian).
18. Solov'ev M.Yu. Institutsional'nye konkurentnye preimushchestva i vzaimoproniknovenie razlichnykh traditsii khozyaistvovaniya [Institutional competitive advantages and interpenetration of different economic traditions]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya “Ekonomika i pravo” [Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series “Economics and Law”], 2015, vol. 25, no. 6 (part 2), pp. 94–106. (In Russian).
19. Popov E.V., Semyachkov K.A. Komparativnyi analiz strategicheskikh aspektov razvitiya tsifrovoi ekonomiki [Comparative analysis of strategic aspects of development of digital economy]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya “Ekonomika” [Perm University Herald. Economy], 2018, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 19–36. (In Russian). doi: 10.17072/1994-9960-2018-1-19-36.

Show full text