Development of tools for inter-cluster interaction management on the resource-oriented approach basis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/1994-9960-2018-4-549-571

Abstract

Clusters are considered by modern economic policy of Russia to be a new tool for regions’ development that is based on the balance between business freedom and the interests of the authorities in the field of socio-economic development of territories and the country in general. However, as the cluster develops, the traditional scheme of its functioning begins restricting the possibilities of using all accumulated competencies and various types of resources in its region. This feature of the cluster development conditions the necessity to pass to the territorial and spatial model of the economy that is aimed at strengthening interregional integration considering sectoral and regional priorities of social and economic development. This idea reflects the relevance of the research theme. Based on the fact that the intercluster interaction creates a stable platform for the development of cluster structures by combining the capabilities of its participants and the effective allocation of resources, the purpose of the study is to develop theoretical and methodological aspects for the formation of the organizational mechanism of management of intercluster interaction on the basis of a resource-oriented approach. The study is methodologically based on interdisciplinary and systematic approaches, modeling methods, dialectical and formal logic. The expediency of an alliance as a form of intercluster interaction has been substantiated on the resource-oriented approach basis. The method provides the most efficient use of competences and resource potential of the cluster participants in comparison to other interaction forms to achieve the purposes of cluster projects. To strengthen the role of the government in the alliance management an integrated form of cooperation – an interregional industry alliance of innovative and production clusters has been suggested. The alliance is managed by a coordinating body – an Intercluster Interaction Control Center that is organized as a form of non-profit partnership at the federal level and it is a government structure. The developed tool for the intercluster interaction management has been tested in the case study of the shipbuilding industry of the Russian Federation. Further studies will be devoted to the determination of optimal conditions and effects of intercluster interactions on the basis of the resource-oriented approach and economic and mathematical modeling tools.

Keywords

resource-oriented approach, clusters, resource potential, intercluster interaction, regional economy, interindustry interaction, alliance, non-profit partnership, shipbuilding industry

For citation

Shalyapina M.A. Development of tools for inter-cluster interaction management on the resource-oriented approach basis. Perm University Herald. Economy, 2018, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 549–571. DOI 10.17072/1994-9960-2018-4-549-571

References

1. Drucker P.F. The new society of organizations. Harvard Business Review, 1992, vol. 70, iss. 5, September – October, pp. 95–104.
2. Porter M. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 1998. November – December, pp. 77–90.
3. Thomson A.M., Perry J.L. Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 2006, vol. 66, iss. s1, pp. 20–32.
4. Ferova I.S., Kozhinova T.V., Shorokhov R.G., et. al. Promyshlennye klastery i ikh rol' v promyshlennoi politike regiona: monografiya [Industrial clusters and their role in the industrial policy of a region: A monograph]. Moscow, INFRA Publ., 2018. 247 p. (In Russian).
5. Shalyapina M.A., Serbulov A.V. Zarubezhnyi opyt formirovaniya i razvitiya innovatsionno-orientirovannykh klasternykh struktur ekonomiki [Foreign experience of formation and development innovation-oriented cluster structures of economy]. Aktual'nye ekonomicheskie issledovaniya Kaliningradskikh vuzov. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov “Soyuz zemlyachestv primorskikh regionov”. Baltiiskii federal'nyi universitet im. I. Kanta, Institut ekonomiki i menedzhmenta [Acute economic studies of Kaliningrad scholars. Collection of scientific works “The union of Primorsk region communities”. Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Institute of Economics and Management]. Kazan, OOO Buk Publ., 2017, pp. 59–68. (In Russian).
6. Shalyapina M.A., Serbulov A.V., Maiorov S.V. Mezhregional'nyi otraslevoi al'yans innovatsionnykh klasterov kak instrument upravleniya vzaimodeistviem regional'noi i otraslevoi innovatsionnykh podsistem [Interregional industry alliance of innovative clusters as a tool for managing the interaction of regional and industrial innovative]. Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti SPbGPU. Ekonomicheskie nauki [St. Petersburg Polytechnic University Journal of Engineering Science and Technologies. Economics], 2017, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 153–161. (In Russian). doi: 10.18721/JE.10614.
7. Akhunov R.R. Razvitie mezhregional'noi integratsii kak napravlenie povysheniya konkurentosposobnosti v sisteme vosproizvodstvennogo potentsiala regiona [The development of the interregional integration as a direction of increase of the competitiveness in the region’s reproductive potential system]. Vestnik UGNTU. Nauka, obrazovanie, ekonomika. Seriya: Ekonomika [Bulletin of USUES. Science, Education, Economy. Series: Economy], 2016, no. 1 (15), pp. 7–17. (In Russian).
8. Uskova T.V., Lukin E.V. O perspektivakh razvitiya regiona na osnove mezhregional'nogo sotrudnichestva [About the prospects for development of the region on the basis of interregional cooperation]. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz [Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast], 2016, no. 3 (45), pp. 60–81. (In Russian). doi: 10.15838/esc.2016.3.45.3.
9. Shalyapina M.A. Retrospektivnyi analiz razvitiya form innovatsionnoi deyatel'nosti v doperestroechnyi period rossiiskoi ekonomiki [Retrospective analysis of the development of innovation activity forms during before perestrioika period of Russian economy]. Problemy sovremennykh integratsionnykh protsessov i puti ikh resheniya. Sbornik statei Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (13 dekabrya 2016 g., g. Omsk). V 2 ch. [Problems of modern integration processes and ways of their solution. Collection of articles of the international scientific and practical conference (December 13, 2006, Omsk). In 2 parts]. Ufa, OOO MTSII OMEGA SAINS Publ. 2016, part 1, pp. 212–218.
10. Porter M.E. Ekonomicheskoe razvitie regionov. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika [Spatial Economics], 2007, no. 1, pp. 108–132. (In Russian).
11. Fritsch M. Does R&D-cooperation behavior differ between regions? Industry and Innovation, 2003, vol. 10, no. 1. pp. 25–39.
12. Ketels C., Lindgvist G., Solvell O. Strengthening clusters and competitiveness in Europe. The role of cluster organizations. The Cluster Observatory, October 2012. 50 p.
13. Rosenfeld S.A. Industrial-strength strategies: Regional business clusters and public policy. Washington, DC, Aspen Institute, 1995. 149 p.
14. Abashkin V.L. Artemov S.V., Islankina E.A., et. al. Klasternaya politika: dostizhenie global'noi konkurentosposobnosti [Cluster policy: Global competitiveness achievements]. Minekonomrazvitiya Rossii, AO RVK Publ., Nats. Issled. Un-t “Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki”. Moscow, NIU VSHE Publ., 2017. 324 p. (In Russian).
15. Smorodinskaya N.V. Globalizirovannaya ekonomika: ot ierarkhii k setevomu ukladu [Globalized economy: From hierarchy to network regime]. Moscow, IE RAN Publ., 2015. 344 p.
16. Shalyapina M.A., Serbulov A.V. Otsenka resursnogo potentsiala i perspektiv klasternogo razvitiya ekonomiki Kaliningradskoi oblasti [Assessment of resource potential and perspectives of cluster development of economy of Kaliningrad region]. Nauchno-tekhnicheskii potentsial kak osnova sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya. Sbornik statei Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (28 fevralya 2018 g., g. Moskva) [Scientific and technical potential as the basis for social and economic development. Collection of articles of the international scientific and practical conference (February 28, 2018, Moscow)]. Moscow, Impul's Publ., 2018, pp. 315–324. (In Russian).
17. Penrose E. The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford University Press, 1959. 304 p.
18. Barney J.B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 1991, vol. 17, no. 1. pp. 99–120.
19. Wernerfelt B. The resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 1984, vol. 5, no. 2. pp. 171–180.
20. Prahalad C.K., Hamel G. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 1990, vol. 68, iss. 3, pp. 79–91.
21. Polanyi M. The tacit dimension. Doubleday, Garden City, NY, 1966. 108 p.
22. Loasby B. The organization of capabilities. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1998, vol. 35, iss. 2, pp. 139–160.
23. Kat'kalo V. S. Evolyutsiya teorii strategicheskogo upravleniya [Evolution of strategic planning theory]. St. Petersburg, Izdat. Dom SpbGU, 2006. 548 p. (In Russian).
24. Karlik A., Platonov V. Analiticheskaya struktura resursno-orientirovannogo podkhoda. Chast' 1 [Analytical structure of resource-oriented approach. Part 1]. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya [Problems of Theory and Practice of Management], 2013, no. 6-7, pp. 26–37. (In Russian).
25. Belousenko M.V. Ekonomicheskaya organizatsiya: resursno-orientirovannyi podkhod [Economic organization: Resource-oriented approach]. Nauchnye trudy DonNTU. Seriya: Ekonomicheskaya [Scientific works of Dinetsk National Technical University. Series: Economic], 2008, no. 34-1, pp. 190–197.
26. Sergeev I., Ponomarenko T. Metodologicheskie aspekty resursnogo podkhoda v strategicheskom upravlenii [Methodological aspects of resource-based approache in the strategic management]. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 2011, vol. 4 (28), pp. 118–126.
27. Aniskin Yu.P., Leont'ev A.V. Organizatsiya sistemy mezhklasternykh vzaimodeistvii v nauchno-sistemnykh integratorakh [Organization of intercluster interactions in scientific and system integrators]. Organizator proizvodstva [Organizer of Production], 2010, no. 4 (47), pp. 33–34.
28. Powell W.W. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1990, vol. 12, pp. 295–336.
29. Sadchikova M.A. Resursnyi podkhod v promyshlennoi klasterizatsii regiona [Resource approach in the industrial clustering of a region]. Mezhdunarodnoe nauchnoe izdanie "Sovremennye fundamental'nye i prikladnye issledovaniya" [International Scientific Periodical "Modern fundamental and applied researches"], 2015, no. S1, pp. 70–73. (In Russian).
30. Shandalov A.V., Frantsuzov A. Yu. Ispol'zovanie proektnogo podkhoda k upravleniyu mezhklasternym informatsionnym vzaimodeistviem khozyaistvuyushchikh sub"ektov [The use of a project method to the management of intercluster information interaction of economic entities]. Transportnoe delo Rossii [Transport Business in Russia], 2006, no. 12-4, pp. 89–90. (In Russian).
31. Goloborodko S.L. Mezhregional'noe ekonomicheskoe vzaimodeistvie kak osnova razvitiya edinogo ekonomicheskogo prostranstva federal'nogo okruga. Diss. kand. ekon. nauk [Interregional economic interaction as the basis for a common economic space of a federal district. Cand. econ. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2006. 193 p. (In Russian).
32. Rukina I.M. Mezhregional'noe ekonomicheskoe sotrudnichestvo i integratsionnye protsessy v ekonomike Rossii. Dis. dokt. ekon. nauk [Interregional economic cooperation and integration processes in the economy of Russia. Dr. econ. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2003. 282 p. (In Russian).
33. Bakumenko O.A. Mezhregional'noe vzaimodeistvie kak faktor razvitiya regional'nykh sotsial'no-ekonomicheskikh sistem (na primere Severo-Zapadnogo federal'nogo okruga) [Interregional cooperation as a factor of regional socio-economic development (on the example of the North West Federal district]. Vestnik Pskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika. Pravo. Upravlenie [Vestnik PskovSU. Series: Economics. Law. Management], 2016, no. 4, pp. 32–47. (In Russian).
34. Makhotaeva M.Yu., Bakumenko O.A. Mezhregional'noe otraslevoe vzaimodeistvie Pskovskoi oblasti: klasternyi podkhod [Interregional sectoral cooperation of Pskov region: Cluster approach]. Servis v Rossii i za rubezhom [Service in Russia and Abroad], 2017, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 32–45. (In Russian). doi: 10.22412/1995-042X-11-7-3.
35. Dezhina I.G. Tekhnologicheskie platformy i innovatsionnye klastery: vmeste ili porozn'? [Technological platforms and innovation clusters: Together or separately]. Moscow, Izdatel'stvo Instituta Gaidara, 2013. 124 p. (In Russian).
36. Taktarov G.A., Nabiev R.A., Kondritskii M.A. Analiz sostoyaniya i tendentsii razvitiya sudostroitel'no-sudoremontnoi otrasli Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Analysis of the condition and tendences of development of ship-building and ship-repairing branch of the Russian Federation]. Vestnik Astrakhanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika [Vestnik of Astrakhan State Technical University. Series: Economics], 2013, no. 2, pp. 118–120. (In Russian).

Show full text

Information about the Author

  • Marina A. Shalyapina, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University

    Postgraduate Student, Institute of Economics and Management

Downloads

Published

2018-12-22

Issue

Section

Regional and municipal economy