Methodical approach to the assessment of the impact of infrastructure availability on social and economic development of Russian regions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/1994-9960-2019-3-434-447Abstract
The necessity to assess infrastructure availability in Russian regions and its impact on social and economic development determines the importance of the study. The justification of the trends of infrastructure availability specified by the population and economic needs suggests the development of corresponding tools. The purpose of the study is to validate methodological approach to the analysis of infrastructure impact on social and economic development of the regions of the Russian Federation. The system of static and dynamic indicators for the assessment of infrastructure state and dynamics of the regions has been presented considering structural and functional content of the infrastructure. It suggests a complex assessment of the impact of each infrastructure element (production, financial and social) separately and in the interaction. The tools for determining the level of provision of the Russian regions with certain types of infrastructure for the ranking of the regions, as well as their comparison with indicators of social and economic development of regional economic systems have been suggested in the research. The results of the econometric analysis of infrastructure factors influence on regional growth and also the cluster analysis of regions by k-means which is based on the summary and integrated indicators of infrastructure provision of the Russian regions have been presented in the article. Using the analysis results we have considered a number of trends that will improve the infrastructure of the Russian regions. Among the most acute trends are the overcoming interregional differences in the availability of infrastructure facilities, the increase of investment in infrastructure development, including through the active use of public-private partnership mechanisms that considers Russian and foreign experience. The research results will improve management decision making for the development of infrastructure both at federal and regional scale. Further studies will be devoted to the monitoring of dynamics of infrastructural development of the Russian regions using the suggested static and dynamic indicators.
Keywordsinfrastructure, infrastructure availability, infrastructure projects, regional economy, static and dynamic indicators, real sector of economy, living standards, public-private partnership
For citationIgnatieva E.D., Mariev O.S., Serkova A.E. Methodical approach to the assessment of the impact of infrastructure availability on social and economic development of Russian regions. Perm University Herald. Economy, 2019, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 434–447. DOI 10.17072/1994-9960-2019-3-434-447
AcknowledgementsThe article was supported by Institute of Economics the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Science according to the plan of scientific research for 2019–2020.
References1. Kudryavtsev A.M., Tarasenko A.A. Metodicheskii podkhod k otsenke razvitiya transportnoi infrastruktury regiona [Methodical approach to an estimation of development of the transport infrastructure of the region]. Fundamental'nye issledovaniya [Fundamental Research], 2014, no. 6-4, pp. 789–793. (In Russian).
2. Malyi V.I., Gusev V.V. Vliyanie predpriyatii energetiki na sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe razvitie i konkurentosposobnost' regiona (na primere Saratovskoi oblasti) [The influence of fuel-enery enterprises on socio-economic development and competitiveness of a region (In the case study of Saratov region)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya [Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science], 2010, no. 1 (9), pp. 137–153. (In Russian).
3. Kiselev S.V., Tkachev S.V. Ekonomiko-matematicheskaya model' otsenki vliyaniya uslug sotsial'noi infrastruktury na ekonomicheskoe razvitie regiona [Economic and mathematical model of the evaluation of the influence of the services of social infrastructure on the economic development of a region]. Fundamental'nye issledovaniya [Fundamental Research], 2015, no. 8-2, pp. 385–391. (In Russian).
4. Dubrovskaya Yu.V., Kopnintseva N.M., Pozdeeva A.N. Transportnaya in-frastruktura kak faktor ekonomicheskogo rosta regiona [Trasport infrastructure as a factor of economic growth of a region]. Gumanitarnye, sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki [Humanities, Social-Economic and Social Sciences], 2015, no. 1, pp. 293–296. (In Russian).
5. Ignat'eva E.D., Mariev O.S., Serkova A.E. Vliyanie infrastrukturnykh faktorov na razvitie real'nogo sektora ekonomiki i kachestvo zhizni naseleniya rossiiskikh regionov [Infrastructural factors influence on the development of economy′s real sector and living standards of population in the Russian regions]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo [Journal of Economy and Entrepreneourship], 2018, no. 3 (92), pp. 573–578. (In Russian).
6. Vlahiniс Lenz N., PavliсSkender H., Mirkoviс P.A. The macroeconomic effects of transport infrastructure on economic growth: The case of Central and Eastern EU member states. Economic Research–Ekonomska Istraživanja, 2018, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 1953–1964.
7. Kyriacou A.P., Muinelo-Gallo L., Roca-Sagales O. The efficiency of transport infrastructure investment and the role of government quality: An empirical analysis. Transport Policy, 2018, vol. 74, pp. 93–102. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.11.017.
8. Kataeva Yu.V. Integral'naya otsenka urovnya razvitiya transportnoi infrastruktury regiona [Integrated estimation of the level of regional infrastructure development]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika [Perm University Herald. Economy], 2013, no. 4 (19), pp. 66–73. (In Russian).
9. Salim W., Negara S.D. Infrastructure development under the Jokowi administration: Progress, challenges and policies. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 2018, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 386–401.
10. De Haan J., Oosterloo S., Schoenmaker D. Financial infrastructures. Financial markets and institutions: A European perspective. 3rd edition. Cambridge University Press, 2015. 528 p.
11. Mandell S., Wihelmsson M. Financial infrastructure and house prices. Applied Economics, 2015, vol. 47 (30), pp. 3175–3188. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2015.1013608.
12. Pagano M.A., Perry D. Financing infrastructure in the 21st century city. Public Works Management and Policy, 2008, vol. 13, iss. 1, pp. 22–38.
13. Andries A.M., Marcu N., Oprea F., Tofan M. Financial infrastructure and access to finance for European SMEs. Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, iss. 10. doi: 10.3390/su10103400.
14. Jusko I.O. International competitiveness of banks in the formation of a new financial infrastructure. Europeanresearcher. Series A, 2016, vol. 112, iss. 11, pp. 567–580. doi: 10.13187/er.2016.112.567.
15. Sharkov N.N. Razvitie finansovoi infrastruktury Rossii kak neobkhodimoe uslovie obespecheniya ekonomicheskogo rosta v usloviyakh finansovoi globalizatsii [Developing the financial infrastructure of Russia as a necessary condition to encure the economic growth under financial globalization]. Finansy i kredit [Finance and Credit], 2015, no. 29, pp. 47–60. (In Russian).
16. Borshchevskii G.A. Sozdanie institutsional'nykh uslovii dlya privle-cheniya investitsii v infrastrukturu: opyt rossiiskikh regionov [Institutional environment creating for attracting investment into infrastructure: The cases of Russian regions]. Voprosy ekonomiki [Issues of Economics], 2019, no. 2, pp. 134–157. (In Russian). doi: 10.32609/0042-8736-2019-2-134-157.
17. Idrisov G.I., Ponomarev Yu.Yu. Infrastrukturnaya ipoteka v Rossii: vozmozhnosti i perspektivy [Infrastructure mortgage in Russia: Opportunities and prospects]. Voprosy ekonomiki [Issues of Economics], 2019, no. 2, pp. 114–133. (In Russian). doi: 10.32609/0042-8736-2019-2-114-133.
18. Finansovyi rynok i finansovo-investitsionnaya infrastruktura: monografiya [Financial market and financial-investment infrastructure]. Pod red. L.A. Tolstolesovoi [L.A. Tolstolesova (Eds.)]. Novosibirsk, SibAK Publ., 2015. 170 p. (In Russian).
19. Gilmour T., Wiesel I., Pinnegar S., Loosemore M. Social infrastructure partnerships: A firm rock in a storm? Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 2010, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 247–259. doi: 10.1108/ 13664381011087506.
20. Roskruge M., Grimes A., McCann P., Poot J. Social capital and regional social infrastructure investment: evidence from New Zealand. International Regional Science Review, 2011, vol. 35, no. 10-03, pp. 3–25.
21. Tikhonovich E.A. Vliyanie sotsial'noi infrastruktury na vosproizvodstvo chelovecheskogo kapitala [The impact of social infrastructure on the production of human capital]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 3. Ekonomika. Ekologiya [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Global Economic System], 2012, no. 1 (20), pp. 22–28. (In Russian).
22. Ofin V.P. Osobennosti realizatsii proektov gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva v transportnoi infrastrukture [Implementation of the public-private partnership projects in transport infratsructure]. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Herald of Saint Petersburg State University of Economics], 2016, no. 5 (101), pp. 50–54. (In Russian).
23. Maksimov V.V. Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnerstvo v transportnoi infrastrukture: kriterii otsenki kontsessionnykh konkursov [Public-private partnership in transport infrastructure: Assessment criteria of concession competitions]. Moscow, Al'pina Pablisherz, 2010. 178 p. (In Russian).
24. Queiroz C., Vajdic N., Mladenovic G. Public private partnerships in roads and government support: Trends in transition and developing economies. Transportation Planning and Technology, 2013, vol. 36, iss. 3, pp. 231–243. doi:10.1080/03081060.2013.779472.