Аn economic and mathematical model for project management of distressed bank assets for the economy of Kazakhstan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/1994-9960-2019-3-388-405Abstract
The global financial crisis 2007–2008 had a significant impact on the banking system of Kazakhstan. The share of overdue debt has risen sharply. As a result, lending to the economy and economic growth has stalled. Financial resources issued to second-tier banks in the amount of three trillion tenge did not increase the volume of lending to the economy. The Government created the Fund of Distressed Loans to form a new mechanism for improving the banking system. According to the foreign experience the organizations of this type are considered to be efficient institutes for the management of distressed assets as their activity improves national economy by buying out the assets and collecting credit debts. This work offers a new mathematical model of the banking system included in the economy model. This is done to study the possibility of using international experience in project management of distressed bank assets in the economy of Kazakhstan. Upon describing a bank system there have been differentiated four economic agents: second-tier banks; subdivisions of second-tier banks specialized on the work with the distressed assets (bad bank); central bank; fund of distressed assets. In describing the activity of second-tier banks there have been defined the internal restrictions on the distressed assets transfer to a bad bank. When describing the activities of a bad bank three key problem resolution schemes have been presented: 1) independent project management of distressed assets; 2) distressed assets irrevocable repurchase; 3) an agreement on buy-back between the fund and a bad bank. To investigate the effect of the banks distressed assets projects at Kazakhstan economy the model is focused at consideration of additional economic agents: producers, private household, and Government. Here as a form of particular scientific results internal restrictions of the second-tier banks to transfer distressed assets to a bad bank has been found for the first time; the amount of households insured deposits, the volume of equity transferred to a bad bank and the amount of the equity additionally decommissioning to a bad bank due to its organization has been calculated; the maximum volume of new credits by the second-tier banks excluding the new credits of a bad bank has also been distinguished. Further studies will be devoted to the verification of the theoretical model in the case study of real statistical data to analyze the impact on the economy of Kazakhstan of various schemes for the repurchase of distressed assets by the Government, as well as to make scenario forecasts. In principal, the constructed model can be used to study the impact of distressed asset management on the economies of other countries.
Keywordsdistressed assets, the Kazakhstan economy, bad bank, global financial crisis, banking system, distressed assets fund, bank balance, government bonds, outright sale scheme, repurchase scheme, economic and mathematical model
For citationKalimoldaev A.M., Olenev N.N. Аn economic and mathematical model for project management of distressed bank assets for the economy of Kazakhstan. Perm University Herald. Economy, 2019, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 388–405. DOI 10.17072/1994-9960-2019-3-388-405
References1. Orakbayev E.M., Boranbayev S.N., Vashenko M.P., Shananin A.A. Mathematical model of Kazakhstan economy. Modern Applied Science, 2015, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 160 – 185. doi: 10.5539/mas.v9n8p160.
2. Petrov A.A. Ob adekvatnosti matematicheskikh modelei ekonomiki [About the adequacy of mathematical models of economics]. Trudy Moskovskogo Fiziko-Tekhnicheskogo Instituta [Proceedings of Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology], 2009, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 53–65. (In Russian).
3. Pospelov I.G. Ravnovesnye modeli ekonomiki v period mirovogo finansovogo krizisa [Equilibrium models of economy during the global financial crisis]. Trudy Moskovskogo Fiziko-Tekhnicheskogo Instituta [Proceedings of Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology], 2009, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 66–83. (In Russian).
4. Andreev M.Yu., Vrezheshch V.P., Khokhlov M.A., Petrov A.A., Pospelov I.G. Zhukova A.A., Zdanovskaya V.S. Opyt modelirovaniya ekonomicheskoi dinamiki Respubliki Kazakhstan v period mirovogo finansovogo krizisa [The experience of modeling the economic dynamics of the Republic of Kazakhstan during the global financial crisis]. Moscow, VTS RAN Publ., 2010. 161 p. (In Russian).
5. Andreev M.Yu., Pil'nik N.P., Pospelov I.G. Model' mezhvremennogo ravnovesiya ekonomiki Respubliki Kazakhstan [Model of inter-temporal equilibrium of the economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Trudy Moskovskogo Fiziko-Tekhnicheskogo Instituta [Proceedings of Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology], 2013, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 62–78. (In Russian).
6. Aleksandrov A.Yu. Upravlenie problemnymi aktivami v krizisnykh usloviyakh [Management of distressed assets in crisis conditions]. Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki [Problems of Modern Economics], 2009, no. 1 (29). (In Russian) Available at: http://www.m-economy.ru/art.php?nArtld=2429 (accessed 25.05.2019).
7. Naidenova R.I. Osnovnye napravleniya effektivnoi organizatsii raboty bankov s problemnymi kreditami [Main directions of effective organization of banks with distressed assets]. Aktual'nye problemy razvitiya ekonomicheskikh, finansovykh i kreditnykh system. Materialy III Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. 8 sentyabrya 2015 g. [Acute problems of the development of economic, financial and credit systems. Proceedings of the III International scientific and practical conference. September 8, 2015]. Belgorod, Izd. dom “Belgorod”, 2015, pp. 141–145. (In Russian).
8. Omir A.Zh., Nusibalieva A.K. Sovershenstvovanie sistemy upravleniya problemnym kreditom v bankakh vtorogo urovnya Respubliki Kazakhstan [Improvement of the distressed credit management system in the second-tier banks of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Antikrizisnye tekhnologii v ekonomike kak faktor razvitiya sovremennogo obshchestva. Materialy VI Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. 10 dekabrya 2015 g. [Anti-crisis technologies in economy as a factor in the development of modern society. Proceedings of the VI International scientific and practical conference. December 10, 2015]. Saratov, Akademiya Biznesa Publ., 2015, pp. 95–98. (In Russian).
9. Borovskii V.N., Borovskaya L.V., Kul'bachnyi P.V. Optimizatsiya upravleniya problemnymi kreditami banka [Optimization of the management of bank distressed credits]. Science Time [Science Time], 2016, no. 3 (27), pp. 93–97. (In Russian).
10. Bondar' A.P., Sorokina A.O. Upravlenie problemnoi zadolzhennost'yu bankami Ukrainy [The Ukrainian bank management of distressed credits]. Nauchnyi vestnik: finansy, banki, investitsii [Scientific Bulletin: Finances, Banks, Investments], 2014, no. 2, pp. 72–76. (In Russian).
11. Bolhar T.M. Managing bad loans of domestic banks under modern economic conditions. Business Inform, 2014, iss. 1, pp. 248–255.
12. Zelik O.E. Praktika upravleniya problemnymi kreditami v zarubezhnykh stranakh [Practice of distressed credit management in foreign countries]. Innovatsionnye modeli razvitiya kooperativnogo sektora ekonomiki. Nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya professorsko-prepodavatel'skogo sostava. 28 aprelya 2015 g. [Innovative models of the development of the cooperative sector of economy. Scientific and practical conference of the teaching staff. April 28, 2015]. Volgograd, Rostov na Donu, Feniks Publ., 2015, pp. 69–73. (In Russian).
13. Lisitsina N.N., Cherkashnev R.Yu. Rossiiskaya i zarubezhnaya praktika raboty s problemnymi kreditami [Russian and foreign practice of working with distressed credits]. Aktual'nye problemy razvitiya finansovogo sektora. Materialy IV Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya. 18 noyabrya 2016 g. [Acute problems of financial sector development. Proceedings of the IV international scientific and practical conference. November 18, 2016]. Tambov, TGU im. G.R. Derzhavina Publ., 2016, pp. 226–235. (In Russian).
14. Kalimoldaev A.M., Olenev N.N. Model' ekonomiki Respubliki Kazakhstan s uchetom problemnykh aktivov [Model of Kazakh Republic economy with distress assets]. Trudy Instituta sistemnogo analiza rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Proceeding of the Institute for Systems Analysis of the Russian Academy of Science], 2018, vol. 68, iss. 2, pp. 80–83. (In Russian). doi: 10.14357/20790279180219.
15. Kalimoldaev A., Mukhamediev B., Olenev N. Distressed assets in a normative dynamic model of Kazakhstan economy. 2018 IX international conference on optimization and applications (OPTIMA 2018). DEStech Transactions on Computer Science and Engineering, 2018, pp. 177–187. doi: 10.12783/dtcse/ optim2018/27931.
16. Buiter W. Good bank vs bad bank: Don't touch the unsecured creditors! Clobber the tax payer instead. Not. VoxEU CEPR’s policy portal, 2009. Available at: http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q= node/3264 (accessed 24.05.2019).
17. Hauck A., Neyer U., Vieten T. Reestablishing stability and avoiding a credit crunch: Comparing different bad bank schemes. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 2015, vol. 57 (C), pp. 116–128.
18. White L.J. The S&L debacle: Public policy lessons for bank and thrift regulation. New York, Oxford University Press, 1991. 287 p.
19. Curry T., Shibut L. The cost of the savings and loan risis: Truth and consequences. FDIC Banking Review, 2000, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 26–35.
20. Bergström C., Englund P., Thorell P. Securum and the way out of the Swedish banking crisis. Stockholm: Summary of a report commissioned by SNS. Center for Business and Policy Studies, 2003. 24 p.
21. Bebchuk L. A. Buying troubled assets. Yale Journal on Regulation, 2009, vol. 26, pp. 343–358. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1392808 (accessed 24.05.2019).
22. Suntum U. van, Ilgmann C. Bad banks: A proposal based on German financial history. European Journal of Law and Economics, 2011, vol. 35, iss. 3, pp. 367–384. doi: 10.1007/s10657-011-9239-6.
23. Tirole J. Overcoming adverse selection: How public intervention can restore market functioning. American Economic Review, 2012 (February), vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 29–59.
24. Tanaka M., Hoggarth G. Resolving banking crises – An analysis of policy options. Bank of England Working Paper, 2006, no. 293. 42 p. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.894883.
25. Pospelov I.G. Modelirovanie ekonomicheskikh struktur [Modeling of economic structures], Moscow, FAZIS, VTS RAN Publ., 2003. 191 p. (In Russian).
26. Pospelov I.G. Novye printsipy i metody razrabotki makromodelei ekonomiki i model' sovremennoi ekonomiki Rossii [New principles and methods of development of macro-models of economy and model of modern economy of Russia]. Moscow, VTS RAN Publ., 2006. 242 p. (In Russian).
27. Olenev N.N. Parameter identification of an endogenous production function. Proceedings of the OPTIMA-2017 Conference. October 02, 2017. Petrovac, Montenegro, 2017, CEUR-WS, vol. 1987, pp. 428–435.
28. Olenev N.N. Identifikatsiya agregirovannoi proizvodstvennoi funktsii s ogranichennym vozrastom moshchnostei dlya ekonomiki Kazakhstana [Identification of the aggregated production function with a limited age of capacities for the economy of Kazakhstan]. Problemy optimizatsii slozhnykh system. Materialy XIV Mezhdunarodnoi aziatskoi shkoly-seminara. 20–31 iyulya 2018 g. [Problems of optimization of complex systems. Proceedings of the XIV international Asian school-seminar. July 20–31, 2018]. Almaty, IIVT MON RK Publ., 2018, Part 2, pp. 119–124. (In Russian).