The impact of the institutional environment digitalization on the sharing economy development

Abstract

The spread of the sharing economy and the growing interest to this concept is caused by the transformation of business models, which is due to the redistribution of the importance of the economic, social and environmental goals of consumers, manufacturers and suppliers of goods and services. Institutional factors of doing business have a particular importance. At the same time, the rise of digital technology has become a catalyst for the transformation of the rules and regulations establishing transactions between economic agents of various levels. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of institutional environment digitalization on the sharing economy development as a basis for its further regulation. The novelty of the research lies in identifying regularities in institutional environment digitalization. The article describes various aspects of analyzing the sharing economy, reveals a narrow and broad interpretation of the studied term based on the fact that the sharing economy is a part of the digital and platform economy. It is shown that the sharing economy is also at the intersection of the access economy, platform economy and community-based economy. Two key approaches to sharing economy are defined: technological with the focus on sharing economy driven by the digital technologies and socioinstitional with the transformations of rules and standards regulating the interaction of economic agents within this model. Correlation-regression analysis is applied to test the hypotheses about the influence of institutional environment digitalization typical for formal and informal institutes, as well as the network relations on the development of the sharing economy. The European Index of Digital Entrepreneurship Systems (EIDES) and The Timbro Sharing Economy Index were used as an information base for the study. The research arrives at a nonlinear regression model showing the significance and impact nature of the development of network relations and social media on the sharing economy. Hypotheses about the influence of the digital component of formal and informal institutions have been refuted. The article justifies the need for the development of inclusive institutes to regulate sharing economy, which will stimulate the solution of social, economic and environmental problems in the society. The theoretical significance of the study lies in expanding the provisions of economic theory in the field of studying the transformation of economic relations under the changes in external and internal socio-economic conditions and the institutional environment development for sharing economy. The practical significance lies in the possibility to apply the conclusions and recommendations to improve socio-economic regulating policy for sharing economy at the macro-, meso- and micro-levels of economy. The results obtained in the research may be of interest to the specialists analyzing the transformation of economic relations and the problems of the formation and development of sharing economy. Further research will relate directly to the issues of institutional design of the sharing economy, as well as the study of the application potential to solve socially significant problems at various levels of management.

Keywords

sharing economy, digitalization, digital platforms, institutional environment, econometric model, formal and informal institutions, networking, platform economics, sharing economy regulation, institutional design

For citation

Veretennikova A.Yu. The impact of the institutional environment digitalization on the sharing economy development. Perm University Herald. Economy, 2020, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 329–343. DOI 10.17072/1994-9960-2020-3-329-343

Acknowledgements

The article is written under the Research and Development Plan in the Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

References

1. Akhmedova A., Mas-Machuca M., Marimon F. Value co-creation in the sharing economy: The role of quality of service provided by peer. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, vol. 266, no. 1. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121736.
2. Curtis S., Mont O. Sharing economy business models for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, vol. 266. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121519.
3. Piscicelli L., Cooper T., Fisher T. The role of values in collaborative consumption: Insights from a product-service system for lending and borrowing in the UK. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, no. 97, pp. 21–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.032.
4. Lang B., Botha E., Robertson J., Kemper J., Dolan R., Kietzmann J. How to grow the sharing economy? Create Prosumers! Australasian Marketing Journal, 2020, vol. 28, iss. 3, pp. 58–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.06.012.
5. Reischauer J. Capturing the dynamics of the sharing economy: Institutional research on the plural forms and practices of sharing economy organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, vol. 125, pp. 11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.023.
6. Yaraghi N., Ravi S. The current and future state of the sharing economy. Brookings India IMPACT, 2017, no. 032017. 38 p.
7. Mont O., Voytenko Palgan O., Bradley K., Zvolska L. A decade of the sharing economy: Concepts, users, business and governance perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, vol. 26, no. 122215. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122215.
8. Davidson N., Infranca J. The sharing economy as an urban phenomenon. Economics of Networks eJournal, 2016. Available at: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Sharing-Economy-as-an-Urban-Phenomenon-Davidson-Infranca/1525e57d03106577facd572eac5081aa06c114ef (accessed 10.06.2020).
9. Selloni D. New forms of economies: Sharing Economy, Collaborative Consumption, Peer-to-Peer Economy. CoDesign for Public-Interest Services. Research for Development, 2017, pp. 15–26. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-53243-1_2.
10. Sutherland W., Jarrahi M.H. The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 2018, vol. 43, pp. 328–341. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.07.004.
11. Albors J., Ramos J.C., Hervas J.L. New learning network paradigms: Communities of objectives, crowdsourcing, wikis and open source. International Journal of Information Management, 2008, no. 28 (3), pp. 194–202. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2007.09.006.
12. Sundararajan A. The sharing economy. The end of employment and the rise of crowd-based capitalism. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2016. 256 p.
13. Botsman R., Rogers R. What’s mine is yours: The rise of collaborative consumption. HarperBusiness, 2010. 304 p.
14. Cheng M. Sharing economy: A review and agenda for future research. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2016, vol. 57, pp. 60–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.06.003.
15. Acquier A., Daudigeos T., Pinkse J. Promises and paradoxes of the sharing economy: An organizing framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, no. 125, pp. 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.006.
16. Laurell C., Sandström C. The sharing economy in social media – analyzing tensions between market and non-market logics. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, no. 125, pp. 58–65. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.038.
17. Hamari J., Sjöklint M., Ukkonen A. The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, no. 67 (9), pp. 2047–2059. doi: 10.1002/asi.23552.
18. Dreyer B., Lüdeke-Freund F., Hamann R., Faccer K. Upsides and downsides of the sharing economy: Collaborative consumption business models’ stakeholder value impacts and their relationship to context. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, vol. 125, pp. 87–104. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.036.
19. Murillo D., Buckland H., Val E. When the sharing economy becomes neoliberalism on steroids: Unravelling the controversies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, vol. 125 (C), pp. 66–76. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.024.
20. Starr R., Zhu A., Frethey-Bentham C., Brodie R. Peer-to-peer interactions in the sharing economy: Exploring the role of reciprocity within a Chinese social network. Australasian Marketing Journal, 2020, vol. 28 (3), pp. 67–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.06.002.
21. Rong K., Xiao F., Wang Y. Redundancy in the sharing economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2019, vol. 151, no. 104455. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104455.
22. Grondys K. Implementation of the sharing economy in the B2B Sector. Sustainability, 2019, vol. 11 (14), pp. 1–16. doi: 10.3390/su11143976.
23. Scavarda A., Daú G., Scavarda L., Azevedo B., Korzenowski A. Social and ecological approaches in urban interfaces: A sharing economy management framework. Science of The Total Environment, 2020, vol. 713. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134407.
24. Nico Heerschap N., Pouw N., Atme C. Measuring online platforms. In cooperation with University van Amsterdam, 2018. 43 p.
25. Katz V. Regulating the sharing economy. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2015, vol. 30, pp. 10–67. doi: 10.15779/Z38HG45.
26. North D. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, 1990. 152 p.
27. Zervas G., Proserpio D., Byers J. The rise of the sharing economy: Estimating the impact of Airbnb on the hotel industry. Boston University School of Management, 2013, Research Paper no. 2013-16. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2366898 (accessed 10.06.2020).
28. Baumber A., Scerri M., Schweinsberg S. A social licence for the sharing economy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, no. 146, pp. 12–23. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.009.
29. Thomson I., Boutilier R. The social license to operate. SME Mining Engineering Handbook, 3rd ed. Darling P. (Ed.). Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Englewood, Colorado, 2011, pp. 1779–1796.
30. Huerta-Alvarez R., Cambra-Fierro J., Fuentes-Blasco M. The interplay between social media communication, brand equity and brand engagement in tourist destinations: An analysis in an emerging economy. Journal of Destination Marketing and Management, 2020, no. 16. doi: 10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100413.
31. Gordeev M.N. Faktory, opredelyayushchie sklonnost' rossiyan k uchastiyu v kraudfandinge [Determinants of Russian people participation in crowdfunding]. Informatsionnoe obshchestvo [Information society], 2019, no. 1–2, pp. 6–15. (In Russian).
32. Jespersen K.R. Crowdsourcing design decisions for optimal integration into the company innovation system. Decision Support Systems, 2018, vol. 115, pp. 52–63. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2018.09.005.
33. Chiappetta Jabbour C.J., Seuring S., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour A.B., Jugend D., Fiorini D., Latan H., Izeppi W.C. Stakeholders, innovative business models for the circular economy and sustainable performance of firms in an emerging economy facing institutional voids. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, vol. 264. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110416.
34. Califf C., Brooks S., Longstreet P. Human-like and System-like Trust in the Sharing Economy: The role of Context and Humanness. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, vol. 154 (С). doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119968.
35. Miller S. First principles for regulating the sharing economy. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 2016, vol. 53, pp. 147–202. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2568016.

Show full text