Investment encouragement mechanisms in forestry sector: Analysis of global experience and its viability in Russia

Abstract

Undoubtedly, a forestry sector is an integral element in the economy of Russia. A forestry sector is defined to be a set of industries, including forest industry and forestry, and its relevant tasks today are to improve the competitiveness of the forest industry and to provide the advanced growth for the sector on the whole. One of the barriers preventing the Russian forestry sector from development is a low recycling degree of raw wood, which, in its turn, is determined by a deficit of wood processing enterprises and underdeveloped investment encouragement mechanisms. Efficient investment strategy should account for the national and international practices, which supports the relevance of this research. The purpose of the study is to systematize the best global practices in investment encouragement in the forestry sector to reason their application in national context with regard to the institutional and natural climatic features of the development in the forest industry and forestry in Russia. Methodology of the research includes general scientific methods, as well as a comprehensive approach aimed to analyze the most relevant national and international materials and reports from the specialized institutions dealing with the issues concerning the forest and forest resources management. The scientific novelty of the research focuses on the classification of the best global practices in investment encouragement in the forestry sector of economy, the classification summarizes the experiences of the leading countries in forestry. The study identifies the most popular investment encouragement methods, including administrative and economic measures, in the leading countries in the respective forest resource reserves. The programs of non-financial support for the forest land users, consultations, and educational programs, R&D encouragement are among the administrative measures. Economic measures cover the fiscal and monetary policy tools, including concessional taxation, public subsidies, joint investment of the projects, and soft loans. The paper proves that direct transfer from the international practices will not give any significant positive effect and development in the forestry sector of Russia and will not improve the competitiveness of the national forest processing companies as the investment encouragement measures should account for the natural climatic, social economic and institutional features of the forestry sector. One should take into account that the forest land property rights belong to the state in the Russian Federation. With these features in mind and the classification of the best global practices in investment encouragement in the forestry sector of economy in hand, it has been found that the support measures which work in Canada are likely to be the most efficient ones under the national conditions because Canada runs similar forest land property rights. Canada practises R&D encouragement and public subsidies which could be implemented in Russia as a type of public-private partnership or other types of joint investment of the projects in the forestry sector. Therefore, the research carefully looks at the public measure started back in 2007 and aimed at large-scale investment projects in forest exploration and identifies a number of associated problems. The most burning issues are as follows: national investors are not sufficiently interested in the project completion, the products from the forest processing enterprises have low profitability, which is determined by high electricity and railway tariffs, there is no spatial distribution scheme for particular types of production with regard to the availability of forest resources and the needs of the domestic market in timber and paper products, wood is harvested illegally on the rented plots designed to be used for the priority investment projects, the forest resources are not sufficiently applied and recovered, the deadlines and other project’s parameters are violated, and the feedback links between the enterprises and the authorities monitoring the projects are underdeveloped. Along with that, the practices of public subsidy programs show that acquiring the status of a priority investment project in forest exploration is seen to be one of the most efficient measures in investment encouragement in the forestry sector. Further research should focus on the development of a comprehensive approach to the analysis of the efficiency of the priority investment projects to justify the offers in investment encouragement mechanism improvement in the forestry sector in Russia. This approach should be based on the analysis of the econometric factors which determine the success of the projects.

Keywords

forest sector, forest resources, forest industry, forestry, forest management, forest exploration, investment encouragement, investment policy, public support measures, priority investment projects

For citation

Ivantsova E.D. Investment encouragement mechanisms in forestry sector: Analysis of global experience and its viability in Russia. Perm University Herald. Economy, 2020, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 566–586. DOI 10.17072/1994-9960-2020-4-566-586

Acknowledgements

The study was funded by the Russian Science Foundation (project no. 19-18-00145).

References

1. Pyzhev A.I. Vliyanie rezhima sobstvennosti na lesa na effektivnost' lesopol'zovaniya: mezhstranovyi analiz [Impact of the ownership regime on forest use efficiency: Cross-country analysis]. Journal of Institutional Studies, 2019, no. 11(3), pp. 182–193. (In Russian). doi: 10.17835/2076-6297.2019.11.3.182-193.
2. Gordeev R.V. Konkurentosposobnost' produktsii lesnogo sektora: novye uroki iz analiza vneshnei torgovli [Improving the Competitiveness of the Forest Products: New lessons from trade analysis]. EKO [ECO], 2018, no. 9, pp. 63–84. (In Russian). doi: 10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2018-9-63-84.
3. Gordeev R.V., Pyzhev A.I., Zander E.V. Lesopromyshlennyi kompleks Krasnoyarskogo kraya: tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiya есопромышленный [The forest sector of the Krasnoyarsk Krai: Major development trends and prospects]. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika [Regional Economics: Theory and Practice], 2017, vol. 15, no. 1 (436), pp. 4–18. (In Russian). doi: 10.24891/re.15.1.4.
4. Antonova N.E. Transformatsiya lesnogo kompleksa za gody rossiiskikh reform: Dal'nevostochnyi srez [Transformation of the forest complex during the years of Russian reforms: The Far Eastern viewpoint]. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika [Spatial Economics], 2017, no. 3, pp. 83–106. (In Russian). doi: 10.14530/se.2017.3.083-106.
5. Pyzhev A.I., Pyzheva Yu.I., Zander E.V. Lesnaya renta v ekonomike Rossii: otsenka i effektivnoe ispol'zovanie [Forest rent income in the economy of Russia: Evaluation and efficient application]. Krasnoyarsk, Sib. feder. un-t Publ., 2015. 202 p. (In Russian).
6. Eskin V.N., Lipin A.S. Regulirovanie lesnogo eksporta [Regulation of forest export]. EKO [ECO], 2007, no. 3, pp. 72–91. (In Russian).
7. Gulin K.A., Dianov S.V., Antonov M.B. Problemy motivatsii arendatorov lesnykh uchastkov na ispol'zovanie effektivnykh metodov lesovosstanovleniya v Rossii [Issues related to the motivation of tenants of forest plots to use effective methods of reforestation in Russia]. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz [Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast], 2019, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 108–123. (In Russian). doi: 10.15838/esc.2019.1.61.6.
8. Blam Yu.Sh., Babenko T.I., Mashkina L.V., Ermolaev O.V. Ekonomicheskie posledstviya gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya lesnogo sektora [Economic implications of public regulation in forest sector]. Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya [Regions: Economics and Sociology], 2011, no. 2, pp. 211–222. (In Russian).
9. Nery T., Polyakov M., Sadler R., White B. Spatial patterns of boom and bust forestry investment development: A case study from Western Australia. Land Use Policy, 2019, vol. 86, pp. 67–77. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.04.015.
10. Abrams J., Becker D., Kudrna J., Moseley C. Does policy matter? The role of policy systems in forest bioenergy development in the United States. Forest Policy and Economics, 2017, vol. 75, pp. 41–48. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.12.007.
11. Zhang D., Stenger A., Harou P.A. Policy instruments for developing planted forests: Theory and practices in China, the U.S., Brazil, and France. Journal of Forest Economics, 2015, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 223–237. doi: 10.1016/j.jfe.2015.09.004.
12. Conigliani C., Cuffaro N., D’Agostino G. Large-scale land investments and forests in Africa. Land Use Policy, 2018, vol. 75, pp. 651–660. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.005.
13. Pacheco P., Jong W. de, Johnson J. The evolution of the timber sector in lowland Bolivia: Examining the influence of three disparate policy approaches. Forest Policy and Economics, 2010, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 271–276. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2009.12.002.
14. Kilgore M.A., Blinn C.A. Policy tools to encourage the application of sustainable timber harvesting practices in the United States and Canada. Forest Policy and Economics, 2004, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 111–127. doi: 10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00116-8.
15. Song N., Aguilar F.X., Butler B.J. Cost-share program participation and family forest owners’ past and intended future management practices. Forest Policy and Economics, 2014, vol. 46, pp. 39–46. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.06.003.
16. Ovaskainen V., Hujala T., Hänninen H., Mikkola J. Cost sharing for timber stand improvements: Inducement or crowding out of private investment? Forest Policy and Economics, 2017, vol. 74, pp. 40–48. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.10.014.
17. Sujova A., Hlavackova P., Safarik D. Analysis of investment effectiveness in the wood processing industry of the Czech Republic. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2015, vol. 26, pp. 382–388. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00868-0.
18. Evison D.C. Estimating annual investment returns from forestry and agriculture in New Zealand. Journal of Forest Economics, 2018, vol. 33, pp. 105–111. doi: 10.1016/j.jfe.2018.06.001.
19. Banerjee O., Alavalapati J.R.R., Lima E. A framework for ex-ante analysis of public investment in forest-based development: An application to the Brazilian Amazon. Forest Policy and Economics, 2016, vol. 73, pp. 204–214. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.09.008.
20. Restrepo H.I., Orrego S.A. A comprehensive analysis of teak plantation investment in Colombia. Forest Policy and Economics, 2015, vol. 57, pp. 31–37. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2015.05.001.
21. Flatberg T., Norstebo V.S., Bjorkelo K., Astrup R., Sovde N.E. A mathematical model for infrastructure investments in the forest sector of coastal Norway. Forest Policy and Economics, 2018, vol. 92, pp. 202–209. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.04.008.
22. Pyzhev A.I., Ivantsova E.D. Instituty prav sobstvennosti na lesnye zemli v Rossii: uroki zarubezhnogo opyta [Property rights institutions on forest lands in Russia: Lessons from foreign experience]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya «Ekonomika» [Herald of Omsk University: Series “Economics”], 2018, no. 3 (63), pp. 48–56. (In Russian). doi: 10.25513/1812- 3988.2018.3.48-56.
23. Pyzhev A.I. Otsenka renty v rossiiskom lesnom komplekse (po dannym auktsionov) [Forest rent assessment for the Russian economy using timber sale auctions data]. Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya [Region: Economics and Sociology], 2015, no. 1 (85), pp. 147–162. (In Russian).
24. Glazyrina I.P. Prioritetnye investitsionnye proekty v lesopol'zovanii: opyt gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva [Priority investment profest in forestry: Experience of public and private partnership]. Kulaginskie chteniya: tekhnika i tekhnologii proizvodstvennykh protsessov. Materialy XVI mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, 28–30 noyabrya, 2016 [Kulagin Readings: Methods and technologies of industrial processes. Proceedings of the XVI International scientific practical conference, 28–30 November 2016]. Chita, Zabaikal'skii gosudarstvennyi universitet Publ., 2016, pp. 74–78. (In Russian).
25. Kolesnikova A.V. Vliyanie mekhanizma prioritetnykh investitsionnykh proektov na razvitie lesopromyshlennogo kompleksa Sibiri i Dal'nego Vostoka [The effect of prior investment projects mechanism on the development of forest-industry complex in the Siberian and the far East federal districts]. EKO [ECO], 2015, no. 8 (494), pp. 81–102. (In Russian). doi: 10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2015-8-81-102.
26. Mironov A.V., Selimenkov R.Yu. Chastno-gosudarstvennoe partnerstvo v lesnom komplekse regiona: rezul'taty realizatsii i problemy razvitiya [Private and public partnership in forestry of the region: Results of implementation and development issues]. Voprosy territorial'nogo razvitiya [Territorial Development Issues], 2013, no. 4 (4), pp. 1–8. (In Russian).
27. Svetnik T.V., Tret'yakova N.P. Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnerstvo v realizatsii prioritetnykh investitsionnykh proektov v oblasti osvoeniya lesov [Public-private partnership in realization priority forests development investment projects]. Sovremennye tekhnologii. Sistemnyi analiz. Modelirovanie [Modern Technologies. System Analysis. Modeling], 2013, no. 1 (37), pp. 241–245. (In Russian).
28. Kuznetsov S.G., Kon'shakova S.A., Davydov I.P. Mekhanizm prioritetnykh investitsionnykh proektov v oblasti osvoeniya lesnykh resursov [The mechanism of priority investment projects in forest resource development]. Izvestiya Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta [Journal of the Ural State University of Economics], 2018, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 101–110. (In Russian). doi: 10.29141/2073-1019-2018-19-2-8.
29. Lapo V.F. Razvitie lesopromyshlennogo kompleksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii: issledovanie effektivnosti metodov gosudarstvennoi podderzhki investitsii [Development of forest industry in the Russian Federation: Studies of efficiency for the methods of investment public support]. Krasnoyarsk, Izd-vo SFU Publ., 2014. 172 p. (In Russian).
30. Lapo V.F. Ekonometricheskoe issledovanie effektivnosti metodov stimulirovaniya investitsii v lesopromyshlennyi kompleks [Efficiency of investment stimulation methods in a timber industry complex: An econometric research]. Prikladnaya ekonometrika [Applied Econometrics], 2014, no. 1 (33), pp. 30–50. (In Russian).

Show full text